Halim Molla vs Mohibul Molla - 2025 Supreme(Cal) 434

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Cal) 434

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Halim Molla – Appellant
Versus
Mohibul Molla – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Trivedi, Sr.Advocate, Mr. Pradip Kumar Kundu, Mr. Kingsuk Mondal
For the Respondent: Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee, Mr. Abhishek Kabir, Mr. Iqbal Kabir
For the State : Mr. Swapan Banerjee, AGP, Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, Mr. Diptendu Narayan Banerjee, Mr. Debraj Sahu

Table of Content
1. application against a trial court's order (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. police assistance to enforce court orders (Para 5 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. arguments regarding possession and injunction violations (Para 8 , 15 , 16)
4. context of the suit and ongoing conflicts (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
5. procedures for enforcement of injunctions (Para 26 , 27 , 29 , 30)
6. order for restoration of possession (Para 60 , 61 , 62)

JUDGMENT :

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.:-

1. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendant and is directed against an order dated May 15, 2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), First Additional Court, Alipore, District 24 Parganas (South) in Title Suit No. 2113 of 2024.

2. By the order impugned, the application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for implementation of the order dated 18.12.2024 with police help stood allowed.

3. The opposite party herein filed a suit for declaration that he is the sole and absolute owner of one shop room under the name and style of M/s. Tul Tul Bhandar and for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner, his men and agents from interfering wit