Aristocrat International Private Limited vs Gouri Shankar Sharma

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Cal) 965

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Aristocrat International Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Gouri Shankar Sharma – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ms. Reshmi Ghosh, Ms. Parna Mukherjee.
For the Respondents: Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee, Sr. Adv., Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, Mr. B. Kumar, Mr. A. Ali, Mr. A. Lakhotia

Table of Content
1. suit for declaration and injunction. (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 18 , 19)
2. potential violation of injunction. (Para 10 , 12 , 39)
3. conditions for police assistance. (Para 25 , 28 , 34 , 43)
4. determination of rights needed. (Para 33 , 36)
5. order of police assistance set aside. (Para 45 , 46 , 47)

JUDGMENT :

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.

1. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendants and is directed against an order being no. 5 dated September 4, 2025 passed by Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1^st Court at Barasat, Dist. North 24 Parganas in Title Suit no. 1175 of 2025.

2. By the order impugned, the application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 herein praying for implementation of the order of ad interim injunction with police help was allowed.

3. The opposite party nos. 1 and 2 herein filed a suit for declaration that the letter dated July 3, 2025 issued by the petitioner no. 2 as managing director of the petitioner no. 1 company for cancellation of LOI dated September, 30, 2024 is illegal, arbitrary, bad in law and not binding upon the Opposite party no.1 an