SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 577

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
GAURANG KANTH, J.
Rukhsana Hamid – Petitioner 
Versus 
State Of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
WPA 18238 of 2024 with WPA 20449 of 2024
Decided On : 13-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Arup Krishna Das, Adv., Mr. Rajarshi Ghosh, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Dipanjan Datta, Adv., Mr. Debangshu Mondal, Adv.
For the Corporation : Mr. Shounak Bhattacharya, Adv.
For the Private Respondent: Mr. S.K. Mondal, Adv.

The Superintendent Engineer validly issued a demolition order under delegated authority, despite challenges regarding notice and natural justice, affirming the necessity of judicial efficiency in municipal governance.

Headnote:(A) West Bengal Municipal Corporation Act, 2006 - Section 266 - Demolition of unauthorized construction - Challenge to demolition order by one co-sharer while seeking its implementation by another - No notice or opportunity of hearing afforded to co-sharer, however, conflicting claims of ownership established - Demolition order validly issued by Superintendent Engineer under delegation of powers from Commissioner, provisions of natural justice adhered to - WPA 20449/2024 dismissed; WPA 18238/2024 allowed. (Paras 28, 40, 46, 48)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, a co-sharer, contends unauthorized construction by her sons without valid sanction; claims order issued without notice to her.

Findings of Court:
Valid delegation of power established; substantive arguments on non-violation of natural justice presented.

Issues: Was the demolition order made with proper authority? Was there a violation of the principles of natural justice in issuing the order?

Ratio Decidendi: The court found no merit in claims of jurisdictional error; the Petitioner was not aggrieved given the separation from her sons.

Result: WPA 20449/2024 dismissed; WPA 18238/2024 allowed.

Table of Content
1. challenge against demolition order context (Para 1 , 2)
2. unauthorized construction complaints to municipality (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. petitioner’s ownership claim and context (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. procedural violations in passing demolition order (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. respondent’s arguments supporting demolition order validity (Para 18 , 20 , 22)
6. delegation of powers under municipal law (Para 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
7. interpretation of statutes regarding powers (Para 34 , 36 , 39)
8. ruling on unauthorized construction (Para 45 , 46)
9. final ruling on writ petitions (Para 47 , 48 , 49)

JUDGMENT :

Gaurang Kanth, J.

1. The demolition order dated 04.03.2024 having Memo No. 3049/(12)/PW/Eng/24 passed by the Superintending Engineer, Asanasol Municipal Corporation in connection with demolition of a certain portion of the Nuruddin House having JL No. 20, Mouza Asanasol Municipality is in consideration in both these matters. In WPA 20449/2024, the Petitioner is challenging the said demolition order where as in 18238/2024, the Petitioner is seeking the implementation of the said demolition order. Hence this Court decided to dispose of both these matters with a common order.

Facts as per WPS 18238/2024

2. The Petitioner claims to be one of the co-sharers of the premises in question. Her case is that one Nuruddin Mistry was the original owner of certain plots of land situated under Mouza- Asansol Municipality, JL No. 20, recorded in Khatian Nos. 8860, 8861, 8862, 13588, 13589, 10793, 10794, 10795, 10796, 10797, 10798, 8866, 8867, 8869, 8870, 8871, 8873–8877, 22250, 22242, 22256, 22255, 22251, 22241, 22243, 22252, and 22254. The Petitioner is one of the successors-in-interest of the late Shri Nuruddin Mistry. Nuruddin House is constructed over the said property. After the death of Nuruddin Mistry, a partition suit, being Title Suit No. 92 of 2023, was instituted and is presently pending before the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Asansol, among the legal heirs of the said late Nuruddin Mistry.

3. The Petitioner in WPA No. 18238 of 2024 (Rukhsana Hamid), contends that private respondents Nos. 6 and 7, namely Abdulla Zakaria and Sulaiman Zakaria, commenced unauthorised construction over a portion of the aforesaid property without obtaining any valid sanctioned building plan. Accordingly, she lodged a complaint dated 29.12.2023 before the Mayor, Asansol Municipal Corporation. Pursuant to the said complaint, officials of the Respondent Municipality carried out a spot inspection and issued a “work stop” notice dated 09.01.2024 against the said private respondents.

4. Despite the issuance of the said notice, Abdulla Zakaria and Sulaiman Zakaria continued with the unauthorised construction. Consequently, the Petitioner lodged another complaint dated 12.02.2024. The Assistant Engineer, Asansol Municipal Corporation, by letter dated 17.02.2024, informed the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Central), Asansol–Durgapur Police Commissionerate, to take appropriate action against the said private respondents.

5. A hearing was thereafter conducted by the Respondent Municipality on 20.02.2024, which was attended by both the Petitioner and the private respondents. As no sanctioned building plan was produced by the private respondents, the Respondent Municipality passed a demolition order dated 04.03.2024, directing the said private respondents to demolish the unauthorised construction within seven days, failing of which the demolition would be carried out by the Municipality itself.

6. Notwithstanding the passing of the demolition order dated 04.03.2024, no demolition was carried out, either by the private respondents or by the Respondent Municipality. The Petitioner thereafter submitted a representation dated 29.05.2025, requesting implementation of the said demolition order.

7. Aggrieved by the continued inaction of the Respondent Municipality in enforcing the demolition order dated 04.03.2024, the Petitioner has prefe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top