IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
GAURANG KANTH, J.
Baleswar Bhuinya – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
WPA 24133 of 2024
Decided On : 12-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks pension and benefits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner's long service and lawful appointment. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. respondent's procedural requirements regarding pension. (Para 15 , 16 , 20) |
| 4. court's analysis of petitioner's appointment status. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 32) |
| 5. court directs the issuance of the ppo. (Para 33 , 36) |
| 6. pension is a vested right; not discretionary. (Para 34) |
JUDGMENT :
Gaurang Kanth, J.
1. The Petitioner, through the present Writ Petition, seeks a direction upon Respondent No. 2 (Director, Local Bodies) and Respondent No. 4 (Chairman, Baidyabati Municipality) to approve his service profile in the IOSMS portal for the purpose of pay fixation and to release his final pension along with other retirement benefits. The Petitioner superannuated from service on 31.01.2022 while holding the post of Road Coolie under Baidyabati Municipality.
2. The facts giving rise to the present petition are as follows:
3. The father of the Petitioner was died on 13.08.1989 and hence the Petitioner was appointed as a Road Coolie on temporary basis w.e.f 25.09.1989 on compassionate ground against the said vacant post in the pay scale of 220-388/- with usual DA and other admissible allowances. The Petitioner continued in the said posts since 25.09.1989 till 31.01.2022 and was getting salary and other financial benefits as available to the permanent employees.
4. After serving for 36 years, the Chairperson of the Municipality, vide letter dated 08.11.2021, informed the Petitioner that, in terms of Section 58 of the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993, he would superannuate on 31.01.2022. Accordingly, the Petitioner retired from service on that date. However, till date, neither pension nor other retirement dues have been released in his favour.
5. The Board of Administers of the Baidyabati Municipality, vide Memo No.3491/B-16 dated 21.02.2022, states that the service files of the Petitioner and his father has already verified by the DDLB, Burwan Division and accordingly all the pension papers along with service files of the petitioner and is in process to forward to DPPG for issuance of PPO. The Petitioner is granted ad-hoc pension @ Rs. 8500/- p.m.
6. The Chairman, Baidyabati Municipality vide letter dated 13.10.2023 forwarded the Petitioner’s service file to the Director, Local Bodies, for verification and fixation of pay.
7. Since his retirement on 31.01.2022, the Petitioner has received only his adhoc pension @ Rs. 8500/-. No other retirement benefits has been released to him till date. He accordingly submitted various representations including representation dated 03.09.2024 to the concerned authorities. However, no reply has been received yet. Aggrieved by the inaction and delay on part of the Respondents, the Petitioner has approached this Hon’ble Court through the present Writ Petition seeking appropriate reliefs.
8. An Affidavit-in-Opposition/Report has been filed on behalf of Respondent No. 2 (Director, Local Bodies), to which the Petitioner has filed his response. However, no Affidavit-in-Opposition has been filed on behalf of Respondent No. 4 (Chairman, Baidyabati Municipality).
Submission on behalf of the Petitioner
9. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has rendered 36 years of unblemished service with the Respondent Municipality. His initial appointment, subsequent pay enhancements, and all other service- related financial benefits were duly recorded in his service book, and verified from time to time by the Chairman of the Respondent Municipality and DDLB, Burwan Division. The Petitioner was appointed as a Road Coolie against a sanctioned and vacant post, and during his tenure, he continuously served in the said post, enjoying all service benefits akin to a regular and permanent employee of the Municipality.
10. Learned Counsel further submits that the Director of Local Bodies and the Commissioner, UDMA Department, vide Le
Pension and retirement benefits are vested rights accrued from service; denial based on unapproved appointment contrary to established law and unjustified by factual evidence.
Pension and retirement benefits are vested rights that cannot be arbitrarily denied, and delay in their release undermines the dignity of retired employees.
Long-serving employees are entitled to equitable treatment in securing retirement benefits, and technical barriers should not hinder their rightful claims.
The withdrawal of a challenge to an appointment by the appointing authority and the subsequent approval of the appointment by the relevant authority validate the appointment and entitle the employee ....
The court affirmed that appointments made by municipalities under Section 53(4) of the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 do not require prior approval, thus entitling the appointed individual to pensio....
The right to receive pension is a property under Article 31(1) of the Constitution, and pension and gratuity are earned benefits, not mere bounties. The Court emphasized the importance of socio-econo....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.