IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
M.A. CHOWDHARY, J.
Mohammad Shafi, S/o. Mohammad Ramzan Wani - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, through Secretary to Ministry of Defense and Ors. - Respondents
WP (C) No. 2502 of 2022
Decided On : 08-05-2024
Pensionary Benefits - Sanitary Inspector - SRO No. 128/1980, SRO 158/2003, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Deokinandan Prasad v. State of Bihar, D. S. Nakara v. Union of India, Dr. Hiral Lal v. State of Bihar & Ors.
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioner seeks quashment of communications directing review DPC and recovery from pension/gratuity. The Petitioner was recruited as Sanitary Mate, promoted to General Supervisor, and later to Sanitary Inspector. After superannuation, faced difficulties in uploading pension documents due to non-existence of Sanitary Inspector post on the SPARASH portal. Respondents issued communications for review DPC and recovery from pension/gratuity.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the Petitioner, having served as Sanitary Inspector for over 20 years, is entitled to pensionary benefits for the said post. The impugned communications were quashed, and the Respondents were directed to release the pensionary benefits in favor of the Petitioner based on the post of Sanitary Inspector last held by him.
Issues: The issues revolved around the denial of pensionary benefits to the Petitioner for the post of Sanitary Inspector, difficulties faced in uploading pension documents, and the legality of the review DPC and recovery from pension/gratuity.
Ratio Decidendi: The right to receive pension is a property under Article 31(1) of the Constitution. Pension and gratuity are not mere bounties but earned benefits. The Court emphasized the importance of socio-economic justice and held that the Petitioner is entitled to pension for the post of Sanitary Inspector held by him for over 20 years.
Final Decision: The Petition was allowed, and the impugned communications were quashed. The Respondents were directed to release the pensionary benefits in favor of the Petitioner based on the post of Sanitary Inspector last held by him. The Petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGMENT :
1. The Petitioner, through the medium of the present Petition, seeks quashment of communication No. C/60548/SPARSH/GS/SD-7 (Adm Civ) dated 15th of June, 2022 issued by the Respondent No.3, communication No. C/60548/SPARSH/GS/SD-7 (Adm Civ) dated 30th of September, 2022 issued by Respondent No.2 and communication No. 18010/5/Addl/GS/SD/Mohd Shafi Wani dated 7th of October, 2022 issued by the Respondent No.4, directing the conduct of review DPC and recovery to be made from the pension/ gratuity of the Petitioner, with further direction to the Respondents to accept the documents and accord sanction to the recommendations dated 20th of July, 2022, 12th of August, 2022 and 12th of September, 2022 made by Respondent No.6 and not to conduct review DPC, so as to demote the Petitioner with further direction to the Respondents to release the pensionary benefits in favour of the Petitioner, including gratuity as per the last pay drawn by the Petitioner as Sanitary Inspector and not to make any recovery from the pensionary benefits, including gratuity of the Petitioner.
2. The Petitioner has pleaded that he came to be recruited in the establishment of Respondent No.8 against the post of Sanitary Mate on temporary basis in the year 1980 and was regularized as such in the year 1992; that he rendered his services to the Respondents with honesty, dedication and to the satisfaction of his superiors and had received various certificates of appreciation for his unblemished, honest and dedicated service from various higher officials of the Respondent-Elite Force; that he came to be promoted to the post of General Supervisor vide Order dated 8th of May, 1998; that he was considered for grant of promotion to the post of Sanitary Inspector as this additional post came to be created vide Order No. 18010/5/Addl/GS(SD)(I) dated 7th of July, 2001 by the Respondent No.4 and that the newly created posts were continued latest by Order dated 10th of November, 2020, wherein sanction was accorded for the continued employment of 106 Conservancy and Administrative Staff, including Sanitary Inspector, against which the Petitioner was promoted; that the Respondents promoted the Petitioner to the post of Sanitary Inspector as he was the only eligible person as cleared by the DPC vide Order dated 12th of September, 2001 and was approved by the competent authority in terms of Order dated 27th of September, 2001, as such, the Petitioner came to be promoted to the post of Sanitary Inspector w.e.f. 13th of September, 2001 in the pay scale of Rs.5000-150-8000; that the Petitioner continued on the post of Sanitary Inspector having been duly promoted till 31st of March, 2022, when he attained the age of superannuation.
3. It has been further pleaded that post superannuation, the Petitioner submitted his documents for the grant and release of pensionary benefits in his favour, and that on account of the digitization of various services since August, 2021, the documents for grant of pensionary benefits in favour of the retired personnel were to be uploaded as the Respondents had established and maintained an online digital database portal, commonly known as SPARASH, however, while assessing the online digital database, the Respondent No.8 was not able to upload the necessary details and documents of the Petitioner for the release and grant of his pensionary benefits on the said portal. Consequently, the Respondent No.8 approached the higher officers, i.e., other Respondents, underlining the difficulties faced in uploading the necessary details of the Petitioner on the online portal. It was further submitted that after superannuation on 31st of March, 2022, the date sheet and other relevant documents were approved by the concerned Controller of Defense Accounts, Srinagar, but while uploading the details on the project SPARASH, the database was not accessible as the post of Sanitary Inspector was not available in the category of the “POST LAST HELD” and cadre on th
Dr. Hira Lal v. State of Bihar & Ors.
Deokinandan Prasad v. State of Bihar
The right to receive pension is a property under Article 31(1) of the Constitution, and pension and gratuity are earned benefits, not mere bounties. The Court emphasized the importance of socio-econo....
Retiral benefits cannot be curtailed post-retirement without final adjudication by competent authority; parity with similarly situated retirees must be granted.
Employee continued in promoted post till superannuation despite stayed reversion entitled to pension on higher post's last pay drawn; reversion not set aside does not affect retiral benefits post-ret....
Post-retirement recovery of excess pay from innocent retired employee impermissible; pension based on last pay drawn unless fraud proven.
The promotions of the petitioners were in conformity with the Rules of 1989, and the objections raised by the State were not valid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.