SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 851

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.
Swapan Santra And Ors. – Petitioners 
Versus
State Of West Bengal And Ors. – Respondents
WPA 21198 of 2025, IA No. CAN 1 2025 With WPA 19606 of 2025 
Decided On : 16-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner (in WPA 21198 of 2025): Mr. Deepnath Roy Chowdhury, Mr.Asif Hussain, Mr. Ovik Sengupta, Ms. Puja Banerjee
For the Cooperative Election Commission : Mr. Srijan Nayak, Ms. Rituparna Maitra
For the State (in WPA 21198 of 2025) : Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty ,Mr. Saptak Sanyal
For the Respondent No. 2: Mr. Ankit Sureka, Mr. Biplob Das, Mr. Asis Dutta
For the Society : Mr. Raja Saha, Mr. Sanjay Mukherjee, Ms. B. Roy
For the Petitioner (in WPA 19606 of 2025): Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee, Mr. Subhajit Panja
For the Interveners (in WPA 21198 of 2025) : Mr. Subhajit Panja.

Judicial intervention is warranted under Article 226 to correct irrational election commission decisions, particularly where rights of participants are compromised by improper proceedings.

Headnote:(A) West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 2006 - Section 63(2) - Election disputes concerning eligibility of voters - The court directed remand of the matter to the Cooperative Election Commission for consideration of pending disputes regarding deceased members included in the voter list. Unlike previous orders that compromised the election process, the court emphasized the need for compliance with legal norms (Paras 1, 3, 11, 14).

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are robust, allowing correction of irrational orders, especially those made by suppression of facts (Paras 13, 16).

Facts of the case:
Petitioners sought to quash the election of delegates and challenge past orders on grounds of ineligible voters included in the list, alleging improper action by the Cooperative Election Commission (Paras 1, 3).

Findings of Court:
The order of the Cooperative Election Commission dated 29th August 2025 was set aside, requiring a fresh decision on the voter dispute and subsequent elections to be scheduled within specified timelines (Paras 16, 17).

Issues: The court addressed whether the Cooperative Election Commission acted improperly by concluding its processes without resolving the pending voter disputes (Paras 12, 14).

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the earlier order did not justify the Cooperative Election Commission's actions and allowed for judicial intervention against irrational decisions made under legislative authority (Paras 13, 16).

Result: The order dated 29th August 2025 is set aside, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

Table of Content
1. challenge against election process initiation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. dispute over voters list and election procedures. (Para 5 , 6 , 11 , 12)
3. court's authority to correct procedural errors. (Para 9 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. order set aside; remit dispute for fresh decision. (Para 16)
5. directions for timely election process compliance. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT :

Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.

1. The instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, praying for a direction upon the respondent nos. 3 to 5 to quash the election of delegates held on 27th July 2025 as also challenging the order dated 29th August, 2025 passed by the Secretary, Cooperative Election Commission being the respondent no.3.

2. The connected application in WPA 19606 of 2025 is for recalling of the order dated 29th August, 2025. Considering the nature of reliefs sought for, all the above matters are taken up together.

3. I find that the principal grievance of the petitioners is directed against the order dated 29th August 2025 passed by the Secretary, Cooperative Election Commission, West Bengal. The above matters have a chequered history. Records would reveal that initially an Assistant Returning Officer was appointed on 28th June 2024 to hold the election of the respondent no. 6 / cooperative society (hereinafter referred to as the “society”). Although, the matter had proceeded up to the stage of publication of the voters list, however, at the instance of the petitioners in WPA 15797 of 2025 and upon considering their grievances that several deceased members and employees of the society who are ineligible to participate in the election process having regard to the provisions of Section 63 (2) of the West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), had been included in the voters list, this Court without interfering with the election process as scheduled, had by order dated 22nd July, 2025 directed the Cooperative Election Commission, West Bengal to ascertain upon giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned on the basis of disclosure made in the writ petition and/or further disclosures to be made whether the names of the employees of the society have been included in the voter list and in the event of such inclusion, strike off their names, with a further direction that if the Cooperative Election Commission, West Bengal is satisfied with regard to the genuinity of the death certificates, of the names of the deceased voters as included in the voters list, by noting the objection, to strike off such names as well.

4. The petitioners claim to be members of the above Cooperative Society and had filed their nomination for contesting the delegate elections.

5. The parties at this stage would jointly submit that the Assistant Returning Officer, pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 22nd July, 2024 had embarked upon an enquiry and had deleted the names of certain employees and certain deceased members, though, Mr. Roy Chowdhury, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners in the instant writ petition would complain that although, particulars of the deceased members and the employees had been disclosed by the petitioners, the Assistant Returning Officer did not act on the basis thereof. Following the aforesaid correction and publication of voter list on 26th July 2025, the election of delegates of the society had been completed on 27th July 2025.

6. Mr. Roy Chowdhury submits that though the election of delegates had been completed, however, since the petitioners were aggrieved by the finalization of the voter list, the petitioners had raised a dispute case before the Cooperative Election Commission, West Bengal in terms of Regulation 3(35) of the West Bengal Co-operative Election Commission Regulations , 2012 on 13th August 2025. The same was registered as Dispute Case No. 24/CEC of 2025.

7. During pendency of the aforesaid dispute case, it appears that another set of members who had contested the delegat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top