IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Rakhi Mitra – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.
1. The petitioners in the instant case have been arraigned and implicated in the criminal proceedings being GR Case No. 388/2021 arising out of Park Street Police Station Case No. 42 dated 29.03.2021 under Sections 283/188 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, presently pending before the Court of the Learned 9th Metropolitan Magistrate at Calcutta. The petitioners have preferred this Criminal Revisional application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., thereby seeking quashing of the proceeding.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner no. 1 was the State Secretary of Mahila Morcha of an opposition party of the State, and petitioner no. 2 was the candidate for the Ballygunge Assembly constituency belonging to the same opposition party. On 29th March, 2021, in the afternoon, the petitioners, along with some party workers, had gone to offer prayers at the Mallickbazar Kali Temple. While on the street near the Temple, they were attacked by a mob of around 50-60 miscreants. They attacked and pushed the petitioner no. 2 to the ground. They also molested and pushed the petitioner no. 1 to the ground. Petitioner no. 1 and other party workers suffered seve
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and Anr
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.
The court quashed criminal proceedings due to police failure to follow procedural mandates, highlighting the necessity for judicial oversight to prevent abuse of process and protect individual rights....
The judgment establishes that police must justify arrests and follow legal procedures, particularly in non-bailable offenses, to protect individual liberties.
Arrest and detention – No arrest can be made in a routine manner on a mere allegation of commission of an offence made against a person – It would be prudent and wise for a Police officer that no arr....
Non-compliance of Section 41(1)(a) of the Cr.P.C. and the issuance of notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. would amount to contempt committed by the concerned Police Officer and would justify the release....
Police must justify arrests under Section 41 CrPC, ensuring compliance with legal standards to protect individual rights.
Arrest may be authorised only if concerned officer has ‘reason to believe’ and there is `satisfaction qua an arrest’ that person has committed an offence – There must be a direct nexus or live link b....
(1) Continued detention of 14 days – The applicants have been in custody for 14 days, today being the 14th day and the continued custody of the applicants in jail is not called for only because some ....
Compliance with procedural safeguards in arrest as established in Arnesh Kumar is crucial, particularly for offenses punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years; violations can infringe fun....
Arrest – Non-service of mandatory Section 41A notice may vitiate arrest.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.