Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Jhuma Rani Pramanick – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the parties and factual background of the untoward incident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. analysis of the railway claims tribunal's initial dismissal of the claim. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. contentions of appellant and respondent regarding evidence and procedural obligations. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. interpretation of section 124a and the duty of railways in adjudicating compensation. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. final ruling granting compensation based on the proven occurrence of an untoward incident. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
Judgment :
Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.
1.The appellant before this Court was an applicant in an application under Section 16 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act 1987 read with Section 124-A of Railways Act 1989 and is aggrieved by the Judgment and Award dated 08-02-2017 passed by Hon’ble Vice-Chairman Railway Claim Tribunal Kolkata Bench in claim Application No. OA (IIU)/Kol/2011/200.
2. The case of the appellant before the Learned Railway Claim Tribunal may be summed up thus:
3. On 25-07-2010 the husband of the applicant since deceased was travelling Ex-Barhampur to Sealdah to fetch gangajal on the head of Lord Shiva
The absence of a ticket does not disqualify a deceased from being considered a bona fide passenger under the Railways Act, and incidents leading to death can be classified as untoward incidents warra....
The mere absence of a journey ticket does not negate a claim of being a bona fide passenger under the Railways Act, as the initial burden lies on the claimants and shifts to the Railways to disprove ....
The deceased was a bonafide passenger and his death was caused in an untoward incident, entitling the claimants to compensation.
The interpretation of the definition of 'passenger' under the Railways Act and the burden of proof for an untoward incident.
The court reaffirmed that the statutory presumption of bona fide travel under the Railways Act must be upheld unless rebutted by the railway administration with clear evidence; failure to do so rende....
The absence of a ticket does not negate the presumption of a passenger's status, and the Railway is liable for compensation under section 124-A for untoward incidents.
The court established that a deceased must be a bona fide passenger to claim compensation under the Railways Act, and evidence of trespassing negates such status.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
