IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ
Afjal Ali Sha @ Abjal Shaukat Sha – Appellant
Versus
State of West Benal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and consolidation of revisional applications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT :
Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.
1. Three revisional applications, specifically CRR 2880 of 2023 (Afjal Ali Sha @ Abjal Shaukat Sha vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.), CRR 464 of 2025 (Dipak Chakraborty vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr.) and CRR 473 of 2026 (The State of West Bengal vs. Anisur Rahaman & Ors.) have been instituted by the respective petitioners seeking to challenge various interlocutory orders. All such orders were passed in connection with Sessions Case No. 23 of 2023, which is currently pending adjudication before the Learned Chief Judge, City Sessions Court, Bichar Bhavan, Calcutta. The said Sessions Court proceedings arose out of Panskura Police Station Case No. 495 of 2019, dated 08.01.2019.
2. As the aforementioned matters pertain to the identical criminal trial, i.e., Sessions Case No. 23 of 2023, and implicate various orders rendered by the same Learned Trial Judge which are under active challenge and possess a direct bearing upon the trial of the instant prosecution, it has been deemed expedient to consider the same concurrently.
3. Prior to addressing the su
Masalti Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakker –vs- State Of Gujarat
State of Bihar v. Laloo Prasad
Criminal Revision - Though there are no limits of the powers of the Court under Section 482 of the Code but the more the power, the more due care and caution is to be exercised in invoking these powe....
Section 311 of the Cr.P.C. allows courts to recall witnesses essential for a just decision, emphasizing that oversights in prosecution do not constitute irreparable lacunae. Judicial discretion must ....
The Trial Court has ample/wide power to summon any material witness or person for examination or re-examination in exercise of its power conferred upon it under Section 311 Cr.P.C. and this discretio....
The court established that the rejection of a application to examine a material witness is revisable when its outcome could terminate proceedings, emphasizing the need for comprehensive evidence in t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.