SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Cal) 408

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA 
MADHURESH PRASAD, PRASENJIT BISWAS, JJ. 
Soumya Kanti Biswas – Petitioner
Versus 
State of West Bengal and others – Respondent
W.P.S.T. 154 of 2025 
Decided On : 20-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, Mr. Santanu Das, Mr. Sagnik Bhattacharya For the Respondent: Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Mr. Debopriyo Karan

Statutory disability certificates issued by competent authorities hold binding legal force. General medical fitness examinations conducted during recruitment cannot override or re-evaluate the degree of disability certified under specialized protective legislation, as such certificates possess sanctity and remain valid unless invalidated through due legal process.

Headnote:(A) Persons with Disabilities Law - Statutory sanctity of disability certificate - Validity - A certificate of disability issued in accordance with the relevant statute by a competent authority holds statutory sanctity and remains valid across all government schemes and public employment notifications. It cannot be ignored or bypassed by extraneous medical boards unless challenged through due process of law. (Paras 12, 16, 17)

(B) Service Law - Recruitment - Medical fitness examination - Scope - A general medical examination board constituted for assessing physical fitness for public employment lacks the authority to supersede or re-evaluate the degree of disability established by a functional, statutory disability certificate. Such examination is restricted to confirming general fitness for duty and cannot negate rights accrued via specialized disability statutes. (Paras 19, 22, 23)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a person with a permanent disability, successfully appeared for a public recruitment process. Following the selection, he underwent a mandatory general medical examination for employment fitness. The candidature was cancelled by the authorities based on a re-assessment by a general board, which contradicted the degree of disability recorded in the petitioner’s existing statutory disability certificate, which had remained consistent since initial issuance.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the existing disability certificate was issued under the appropriate statutory framework and possessed legal finality. The general medical board for employment fitness has no mandate to overturn findings of disability that have already been adjudicated by specialized authorities under the protective legislation governing persons with disabilities.

Issues: Whether a general medical fitness board for recruitment can override a previously issued statutory disability certificate to cancel the candidature of an otherwise selected applicant based on a lower assessment of disability.

Ratio Decidendi: A certificate of disability issued under specialized statutory provisions constitutes conclusive proof of the nature and extent of a disability. Such certifications are legally binding and cannot be disregarded or varied by non-specialist general medical boards during the process of verifying appointment fitness, as the latter lacks the specific statutory jurisdiction to review or invalidate the former.

Result: Petition allowed; order of cancellation quashed.

Table of Content
1. process of disability certification and public recruitment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. legal sanctity and validity of statutory disability certificates. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. statutory certificates prevail over general medical assessments. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. general fitness exams cannot override specific disability legislation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. quashing cancellation order and directing appointment. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)

Judgment :

Madhuresh Prasad, J.

1. The writ petitioner was the applicant before the West Bengal State Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter in short referred to as the Tribunal). His Original Application (OA) bearing number 423 of 2024, was rejected by the Tribunal by its order dated 15.05.2025, which is the subject matter of the present Writ Petition.

2. The factual background to filing of the OA is that the applicant was diagnosed with Mild Cerebral Palsy with Right Sided Hemiparesis when he was four years of age. The diagnosis continued consistently throughout the petitioner’s life thereafter.

3. The first certificate of disability was issued on 22.10.1998, certifying petitioner’s disability to the extent of 55 per cent. The next certificate containing consistent certification of the same disability and to the same extent is dated 20.11.2004. Both certificates are issued by the District Hospital, Howrah. The second certificate dated 20.11.2004 was issued by a board of four doctors when the petitioner was ten years of age.

4. After the petitioner crossed 20 years of age, the third certificate also certified the petitioner’s disability and its extent (55 per cent). The same was issued on 06.09.2014, and is bearing certificate serial No. DHH/1058/14, issued as per instructions issued by the Government of India, in the Ministry of Welfare, in this regard vide Memo No. 4- 2/83 III dt. 06.08.1986 by a Board consisting of Chairman and three members.

5. The writ petitioner completed a Diploma Course in Ayurvedic Pharmacy and registered himself as Ayurvedic Pharmacist in Paschim Banga Ayurved Parishad (hereinafter in short referred to as PBAP). Being possessed with such qualification the petitioner applied in response to an advertisement issued by the West Bengal Health Recruitment Board (hereinafter in short referred to as the Recruitment Board) vide notification dated 15.03.2023 (Memo No. 432/HFW- 53024/14/2023-HRB), inviting applications for recruitment of Ayurvedic Pharmacists in the Department of Health and Family welfare, AYUSH Branch.

6. The petitioner participated in the recruitment process and his name figured in the overall performance list of eligible candidates as a selected candidate, against the sole (PWD) vacancy against general (Unreserved vacancy). The panel of selected candidates dated 16.10.2023 was valid for a period of one year.

7. Immediately after preparation of the Panel, a schedule for verification of documents was notified on 28.11.2023 wherein the petitioner’s name figured at Serial No. 31. The recommended candidates including the petitioner were thereafter by a Notification dated 02.02.2024, issued by the Special Secretary, (AYUSH) Health & Family welfare Department to the Government of West Bengal, asked to participate in the counselling procedure.

8. Upon completion of the entire exercise the petitioner was required to undergo medical examination pursuant to which “medical certificate of fitness” was to be issued in terms of the provisions contained in the WEST BENGAL SERVICE RULES (WBSR in short) Part 1. Such scrutiny of medical fitness is contemplated at the threshold of an appointment to ascertain whether the person is fit to perform the duties.

9. It is at this juncture that writ petitioner’s candidature was cancelled by an order dated 04.03.2024, issued under the signature of the Special Secretary (AYUSH) Health and Family Welfare Department. The order states that the cancellation is on account of lower percentag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top