R.S.GARG
SMT. MANJU BARADIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appellant being aggrieved by the judgment dated 23rd March, 2001 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 326/99 by the learned Sessions Judge, Raipur, confirming the conviction of the applicant under Section 304-A read with Section 201, I. P. C. recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Raipur in Criminal Case No. 349/98 on 3-8-99, has filed this revision petition.
( 2 ) ). It is to be noted that the learned trial Judge after convicting the applicant under S. 304-A, I. P. C. awarded 11/2 years R. I. and imposed fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further R. I. for three months and, awarded six months R. I. and imposed fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further R. I. for one month, for offence under Section 201, I. P. C. But the learned appellate Court partly allowed the appeal; while upholding the conviction, the learned Sessions Judge reduced the jail sentence awarded under Section 304-A, I. P. C. from 11/2 years to 1 year and, 6 months to 3 months for offence under Section 201, I. P. C. ; but maintained the imposition of fine for each offence.
( 3 ) ). The prosecution case in brief is that the
Referred to : Mohammed Aynuddin alias Miyam v. State of Andhra Pradesh
N. K. V. Bros. (P) Ltd. v. M. Karumai Ammal
Syed Akbar v. State of Karnataka
Mrs. Shakila Khader v. Nausher Gama
Mahadeo Hari Lokre v. State of Maharashtra
Suleman Rahiman v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.