N.K.AGARWAL
HEMANT SAHU – Appellant
Versus
SHAILJA SAMUEL – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD on admission and question of maintainability of the petitions. This batch of petitions involve common question of law. Therefore, all the petitions are being disposed of by this common order.
( 2 ) W. P. (227) Nos. 1520/09,1532/09,1531/ 09, 1524/09, 1539/09, 1522/09, 1521/09, 1545/09, 1197/09, 2121/09, 2123/09, 1913/ 09, 1916/09, 1917/09, 1930/09, 2122/09, 2239/09, 2094/09, 2096/09, 1202/09, 2116/ 09, 2237/09, 2120/09, 2240/09, 2238/09, 2242/09, 2241/09, 284/09, 247/09, 282/09, 283/09, 248/09, 1193/09, 1921/09, 1928/09, 1919/09, 7051/08, 1203/09, 416/09, 411/09, 246/09,6951/08, 6947/08,6949/08,6950/08, 1198/09 and 281/09 are directed against the order passed by the State Consumer Dispute redressal Commission, Raipur, (for short 'state Commission'), whereby and whereunder the State Commission has dismissed the appeal on account of refusal to comply Second Proviso to Section 15 of the Consumer protection Act, 1986 (for short 'the Act, 1986') by the petitioner. These petitions have been preferred by the petitioner seeking inter alia following reliefs:
i. That, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the entire records of the case from distt. Forum Durg and State C
REFERRED TO : B.K.Muniraju v. State of Karnataka
Sanjana M.Wig v. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.
State of H.P. v. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd.
U.P. Spinning Co. Ltd. v. R.S.Pandey
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nicolletta Rohtagi
Marine Container Services South Pvt. Ltd. v. Go Go Garments
Shyam Kishore v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.