( 1 ) THE petitioners have moved the writ application challenging the C. D. F. Case No. 900 of 1990 or another case with the cause-title of Mahangilal Barmecha vs. M. Taneza ond another pending before the Calcutta District Forum as well as the notice to show cause under section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The petitioners prayed for quashing the plaint filed by Mr. Barmecha and the ad interim 'order dated 20th February, 1990 passed by the President of the Forum. The petitioners also prayed to remove the respondent No. 2 Mr. Shyam Sundar Gupta, from the office of the President of the Calcutta District Forum.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioners, in short, is that they are permanent teachers of Arya Vidya Mandir approved and recognised by the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education. The petitioner No. 1 is, a Headmistress and the petitioner No. 2 is the class-teacher of Class X-A. The School imparts general education above the primary education stage qualifying the students for admission to a Certificate, diploma or degree course instituted by the University or the Government. The petitioners were approved and appointed teachers in term of Rule 28 of the M