SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Chh) 81

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
Ramanyandas – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondents: Gautam Khetrapal, Govt. Adv. and Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer

JUDGMENT

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.

1. This appeal is directed against impugned judgment of conviction and sentence dated 7-4-98 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti in Sessions Trial No. 128/07 whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as described below-

Conviction

Sentence

Under Section 498(a) IPC

One Year R.I. for each and fine of Rs.1000/- each in default R.I. for 6 month each.

Under Section 304(b) of IPC

Seven Year R.I. for each and fine of Rs.2000/- each in default R.I. for one yeat each.

As per prosecution story, Navdha Bai was married to appellant-Ramayandas. For marriage of brother of Navdha Bai, a loan was taken from the appellants, which was not being repaid. Navdha Bai was being repeatedly subjected to harassment, cruelty and she was left behind in her parental house, pregnancy was aborted. The loan amount of Rs. 6,000/- was repaid with interest, total amounting to Rs. 9,075/- on 24-9-1996 in the presence of witnesses in Panchayat meeting. After three months, on 18-12-1996, Navdha Bai was found





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top