ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
B. K. GUPTA (WRONGLY MENTIONED AS V. K. GUPTA) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE – Respondent
Arvind Singh Chandel, J.
Since both the revisions arise out of the same criminal case pending before the Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (henceforth 'the Act of 1988'), they are disposed of together by this common order.
2. The present revisions have been preferred against the orders dated 17.7.2018 and 28.7.2018 passed by the Special Judge under the Act of 1988, Bemetara in Special Case No.3 of 2016. Vide impugned order dated 17.7.2018, the Special Court has rejected the objection of the Applicants raised with regard to its jurisdiction and vide impugned order dated 28.7.2018, the Special Court has framed charges against all the Applicants for offences punishable under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Facts, in brief, are that the Respondent/State filed a charge-sheet in Crime No.13 of 2006 against absconded co-accused a public servant, namely, Om Prakash Verma, the then Tahsildar, Saja and against the present Applicants for offences punishable under Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Act of 1988 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. According to the prosecution case, M/s Pochi Farms Private Limited (henceforth 'the Pochi Fa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.