PARTH PRATEEM SAHU
Premchand – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Parth Prateem Sahu, J.
1. Appellant by this appeal would assail judgment dated 20.06.2002 passed in Sessions Trial-116 of 2001 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti, District-Bilaspur, whereby appellant was convicted under Sections 363, 366 and 376(1) of the IPC and awarded sentences as mentioned below :
| Conviction | Sentence |
| Under Section 363 of IPC | RI for 3 years and Rs. 500/- fine amount in default of payment RI for three months |
| Under Section 366 of IPC | RI for 5 years and fine amount Rs. 1,000/- in default of payment RI for six months |
| Under Section 376(1) of IPC | RI for 10 years and fine amount Rs. 2,000/- in default of payment RI for one year. All sentences to run concurrently |
2. Facts relevant for disposal of this appeal are that father of prosecutrix lodged report before concerned Police Station on 20.11.2000 stating therein that his daughter went away from house on 17.11.2000 at about 4 pm intimating her family members that she is going out to answer nature's call. She did not return back, she was searched at nearby places. D
Birad Mal Singhvi v. Anand Purohit
Rakesh Kumar Dongare @ Chhotu v. State of CG
Shivcharan @ Jarha v. State of MP
Independent Thought v. Union of India and another
State of Chhattisgarh v. Lekhram
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Preetam
State of Karnataka v. Bantara Sudhakara @ Sudha and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.