SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
Mahesh Ram W/o Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. These four criminal appeals under Section 374(2) of CrPC emanate from impugned judgment dated 02/02/2017 passed in Special Sessions Trial No. 11/2015, therefore, all these appeals have been clubbed together, heard together and are being decided by this common judgment. Vide the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence, learned Session Judge and Special Judge (Atrocities), Balodabazar has convicted the appellants and awarded sentence as follows :
| Sr. No. | Offence | Sentence | Fine | Other |
| 1. | Section 294 r/w 149 IPC | R.I. for 1 month | - | - |
| 2. | Section 148 r/w 149 IPC | R.I. for 6 months | - | - |
| 3. | Section 324 r/w 149 IPC | R.I. for 6 months | - | - |
| 4. | Section 302 r/w 149 IPC | Life imprisonment | Rs. 500/- each | In default of payment of fine, S.I. for 6 months |
2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 19/06/2015 at about 05:30 PM at village Banahil, P.S. Bilaigarh, the appellants, in furtherance of their common intention, abused and assaulted Chandai Bai, wife of Firatram (P.W.7), wi
Debashis Daw v. State of West Bengal
Joseph v. State of Kerala, 1995 SCC (Cri.) 165
Krishna v. State of Maharashtra
Rohtas and another v. State of Haryana
Roy Fernandes v. State of Goa and others
V.K. Mishra and another v. State of Uttarakhand and another
Willie (William) Slaney v. State of M.P.
Arumugam v. State [(2008) 15 SCC 590 : (2009) 3 SCC (Cri) 1130]
Arjun v. State of Chhattisgarh
Atmaram Zingaraji v. State of Maharashtra
Akhtar Alam v. State of West Bengal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.