Santosh Yadav S/o Sonsingh Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Chh) 389

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI
Santosh Yadav S/o Sonsingh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Dy. AG

JUDGMENT :

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

1. This criminal appeal preferred by the appellant herein under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.1.2016 passed by the learned Special Judge, Kabirdham (Kawardha) (CG) in ST No.144/2015, whereby, the learned Special Judge has convicted and sentenced the appellant in the following manner :

Conviction	Sentence
Section 363 of the IPC	RI for 7 years
Section 366 of the IPC	RI for 10 years
Section 376 of the IPC	RI for 10 years
Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act	Life Imprisonment
Section 3(1)(xii) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act	RI for 5 years
Section 3 & 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short “the POCSO Act”)	RI for 7 years

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 26.7.2015, at about 7:00 p.m., in Gram Maradabhra, Police Station Chilphi, the appellant abducted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Chh) 389

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARISantosh Yadav S/o Sonsingh Yadav – AppellantVersusState Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI
Santosh Yadav S/o Sonsingh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent