DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI
Nizam Ali S/o Sunhar Ali – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Kumar S/o Ramkhilawan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard
2. This petition has been preferred against the order dated 9.5.2019 in Civil Suit No.3-A/2019 passed by the Eight Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, whereby, an application filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs under Order 8 Rule 10 of CPC, has been dismissed.
3. Mr. Sudhir Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the plaintiffs have filed a suit on 02.1.2019, in which, defendant No.1 has appeared on 17.1.2019, but he has not filed the written statement within the stipulated period of 30 days as prescribed under Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC. Though respondent No.1 has filed the written statement within 90 days from the date of service of summons, but he neither filed any application for further extension of limitation to file the written statement nor stated the reason for late filing of the written statement. He further submits that the petitioners/plaintiffs have moved an application on 21.2.2019 under Order 8 Rule 10 of CPC as the defendant has failed to file the written statement under Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC within the time permitted or fixed by the Court. Consequently, the trial Court, in an arbitrary manner, dismissed the application of the plai
M/s. SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. And others
Mohammed Yusuf Vs. Faij Mohammad and others
Prakash Corporates Vs. Dee Vee Projects Limited
R.N.Jadi & Brothers and Ors. Vs. Subhashchandra - (2007) 6 SCC 420
Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India
State of Bihar and others Vs. Bihar Rajya Bhumi Vikas Bank Samiti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.