SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
... – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.]
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374 (2) has been preferred by the appellant against impugned judgment dated 23/12/2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), South Bastar, Distt. Dantewada in Special Sessions Case No. 12/2021 whereby the appellant has been convicted for offences punishable under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
Prosecution story :-
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the appellant herein, on the pretext of marriage, committed sexual intercourse with the victim, aged less than 16 years, on 02/08/2020 at about 11 AM and on 15/08/2020 at his mother's house in Forest Colony Deepopara within the ambit of Police Station Bijapur on account of which she got pregnant and he thereby, committed the aforesaid offences.
3. Further case of the prosecution is that a memo was received at the Bijapur Police Station vide Ex. P/22 from the District Hospital, Bijapur pursuant to which the Gopal Singh Thakur (P.W.-9), A.S.I, Police Station Bijapur went to the Hospital wherein upon enquiry, mother of the victim (P.W.- 2) informed him that on 28/12/202
Ram Kishan Singh v. Harmit Kaur and another
George and others v. State of Kerala and another
Jogendra Nahak v. Stae of Orissa
CCE v. Duncan Agro Industries Ltd.
Somasundaram alias Somu v. State represented by the Deputy Commissioner of Police
Section 157 of Evidence Act makes it clear that a statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC can be relied upon for purpose of corroborating statements made by witnesses in committal court or even to ....
The evidentiary value of a victim's statement recorded under section 164 of Cr.P.C. and the need for legislative amendments to give it status as examination-in-chief in all eventualities.
The statement of a deceased victim recorded under Section 164 CrPC is not substantive evidence and cannot solely support a conviction; the prosecution must prove the victim's age and provide corrobor....
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, and statements recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code are not substantive evidence.
Sexual assault on girl child – If evidence of witness is cogent, consistent and unwavering she qualifies as a sterling witness upon whose evidence conviction of perpetrator can be based.
Conviction for rape and aggravated penetrative sexual assault on infant girl by finger insertion upheld based on victim's reliable testimony corroborated by medical (hymenal tears) and forensic (DNA)....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.