Satyamanu Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Pat) 975

GUNNU ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Satyamanu Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s Bindhyachal Singh, Sr. Adv., Parijat Saurav, Vipin Kumar Singh.
For the Respondent: Ms. Shasi Bala Verma, A.P.P.

Gunnu Anupama Chakravarthy, J. – This appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction dated 07.02.2022 and order of sentence dated 09.02.2022 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge VI-cum- Special Judge, POCSO Act, Buxar in POCSO Case No. 18/2015 (which arose out of the case No. 137 of 2013 of Dumraon P.S), wherein the appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 376(2)(f), 377 of the Indian Penal Code, and under Section 4 of the POCSO Act as under: –

Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 206 of 2022

Appellant’s Name	Convicted under Section	Imprisonment	Sentence Fine(Rs.)	In default of fine
Satyamanu Kumar Singh	376(2)(f) of the I.P.C.	Imprisonment for life	1,00,000/-	S.I. for 1 year
	377 of the I.P.C.	R.I. for 10 years.	50,000/-	S.I. for 6 months
	4 of the POCSO Act	R.I. for 20 years	1,00,000/-	S.I. for 1 year

2. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

3. We are not disclosing the name of the victim and the prosecution witnesses in this case as the matter pertains to POCSO Act as well as under Section 376 of the I.P.C.

4. We have heard Mr Bindhyachal Singh, Learned Senior counsel for the appellant the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Pat) 975

GUNNU ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGHSatyamanu Kumar Singh – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

GUNNU ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Satyamanu Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent