Mannu Ram Goti S/o Shekhu Ram Goti vs State of Chhattisgarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Chh) 152

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
Mannu Ram Goti S/o Shekhu Ram Goti – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Dharmesh Shrivastava, H.S. Patel, Sandeep Shrivastava, Anchal Kumar Matre, Arvind Sinha.
For the Respondent: Ashish Tiwari.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J.

1. Since all the six criminal appeals have arisen out of one and same impugned judgment dated 30-10-2013 passed by the Special Judge (Atrocities), North Bastar Kanker in Special (Atrocities) Sessions Trial No. 7/2013 and since common question of fact and law is involved in all the six appeals, they have been clubbed together, heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. These six criminal appeals have been preferred by the accused/appellants (A-1 to A-8) under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. against the impugned judgment convicting and sentencing them as under:

Mannuram Goti (A-1)
Conviction	Sentence
Section 450 of the IPC	RI for ten years and fine of Rs. 500/- in default, additional RI for two months
Section 376(2)(g) read with clauses (b), (c), (f) read with Section 120B of the IPC for committing offence against victims No. 1 to 12 and 15	Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 500/- in default, additional SI for two months (12 times)
Section 354 of the IPC for committing offence agains

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Chh) 152

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, ARVIND SINGH CHANDELMannu Ram Goti S/o Shekhu Ram Goti – AppellantVersusState of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Cases Referred (5)

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
Mannu Ram Goti S/o Shekhu Ram Goti – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent