SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
Babala Paradhi S/o Kriparam Paradhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J.
1. This criminal appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the impugned judgment dated 24.01.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Durg in Sessions Trial No. 25/2013 whereby he has been convicted for offence punishable under Sections 364, 302 and 201 of IPC and he has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years with fine of Rs. 100/- in default of payment of fine R.I. for 10 days, life imprisonment with fine of Rs. 100/- in default of payment of fine R.I. for 10 days and R.I. for 3 years with fine of Rs. 100/- in default of payment of fine, R.I. for 10 days, with a direction to run all the sentences concurrently.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 06.06.2012 at about 4 PM, the appellant herein along with two other co-accused persons namely Sarjuram and Jeeyanram, in furtherance of their common intention of causing death of Bhola @ Arjun Pardhi, aged about 8 years, abducted him for ransom but they caused his death by strangulating him and assaulting him with stone on his head and buried his dead body in order to screen themselves from the offence and thereby, committed the aforesaid offe
Attygalle and Another vs. The King
Arvind Singh vs. State of Maharashtra
Anjan Kumar Sarma vs. State of Assam
Kanhaiyalal vs. State of Rajasthan
Ningappa Yallappa Hosamani vs. State of Karnataka
Rajender vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
State of Maharashtra vs. Suresh
Sucha Singh vs. State of Punjab
State of Goa vs. Sanjay Thakran
Stephen Seneviratne vs. The King
Shambhu Nath Mehra vs. State of Ajmer
Murder and disappearance of evidence – Whenever any doubt emanates in mind of Court, benefit shall accrue to accused and not prosecution – Conviction only on the basis of last seen together cannot be....
The main legal point established is the requirement for corroborative evidence to establish guilt, the limitations of the memorandum statement under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, and the inadmissib....
Under Section 299 of IPC, homicide becomes culpable when a human being terminates life of another in a blameworthy manner.
In a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence, multiple corroborative factors, including the last seen theory and absence of alternative explanations, can establish guilt beyond reasonable ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.