IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay K. Agrawal, Radhakishan Agrawal, JJ.
Chingdu Kashyap S/o Lakhiram Kashyap - Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh through the Station House Officer – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 483 of 2014
Decided On : 17-03-2023
Indian Procedure Code,1860 - Section 302 - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 175, 374(2) and 313 - Offence of Murder - Whether death of deceased was homicidal in nature and whether it has been proved by prosecution - Held, prosecution has failed to prove that the death of deceased was homicidal in nature, which is sine qua non for convicting an accused for offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC and though the appellant has failed to furnish explanation in his statement under Section 313 or CrPC as to how his wife Manbati died and her dead body was found in his house in a suspicious circumstance, but since the death of Manbati could not be proved to be homicidal in nature, the appellant is entitled for acquittal on the basis of benefit of doubt. As such, the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence is hereby set aside and we hereby acquit the appellant from the charge levelled against him. Since he is in jail, we direct that he be released forthwith, if his detention is not required in any other case - Appeal Allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of CrPC is directed against the impugned judgment dated 13/02/2014 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bastar Place – Jagdalpur in Sessions trial No. 78/2012 whereby the appellant has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC and he has been sentenced to life imprisonment till death with fine of Rs. 2000/-.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the appellant herein, with the intention of causing death of his wife Manbati, strangulated her and assaulted her with tangiya (axe) by which she suffered grievous injuries and died and he, thereby, committed the aforesaid offence.
3. Further case of the prosecution is that on 24/02/2012 at about 12:30 PM, Banmali Kashyap (P.W.-3) lodged a report that on 19/02/2012, his daughter Manbati and son-in-law (appellant) came to his house at Village Aadawal along with their 4 years old son Suraj and told him that both of them were going to Sumalwada temple on the eve of Mahashivratri and left their son with him and told him that they will return shortly to take their son back, but they did not return to take their son as they had informed earlier. After a period of 5 days, on 24/02/2012, Kotwar of village Bilouri Santoram Kashyap (P.W.-6) and Upsarpanch Girdhar Sinha (P.W.-11) went to Village Aadawal and informed Banmali Kashyap (P.W.-3) that the house in which his daughter and son-in-law used to reside has been locked from outside and a foul smell is coming from inside and they suspect that something has happened to his daughter. Thereafter, Banmali Kashyap (P.W.-3) accompanied them and went to his daughter's house and found that the house was locked from outside. He along with other villagers went to the roof and when he removed the stones, he saw that the dead body of his daughter Manbati was lying inside the room and flies were buzzing around her. He called the Police and informed about the same at Police Station Frezerpur. Police reached on the spot and broke the lock and entered inside the house and found that dead body of Manbati was lying on the floor and she was covered with a blanket. When they removed the blanket, they found that she had been assaulted with a sharp edged weapon in her ribs and back and the appellant herein was found absconding.
4. Pursuant thereof, dehati nalishi was registered at Police Station Frezerpur vide Ex. P/3 and after issuing summons to the witnesses under Section 175 of CrPC vide Ex. P/4, inquest was conducted vide Ex. P/5. The dead body of Manbati was sent for postmortem to Maharani Hospital, Jagdalpur which was conducted by Dr. Sanjay Basak (P.W.-7) and as per the postmortem report (Ex. P/12), cause of death could not be specifically ascertained as the body had decomposed and it had been damaged by maggots and it had turned blackish in colour. From the spot, door handle, lock, plain soil as well as blood stained soil were seized vide Ex. P/11 and after taking the appellant into custody, his memorandum statement was recorded vide Ex. P/7 and at his instance, bloodstained axe was seized vide Ex. P/8 and the said seized articles were sent for FSL. On 25/05/2012, the Station House Officer, Police Station Frezerpur had made a query to Dr. Sanjay Basak (P.W.-7) as to whether the deceased could have died on account of the injuries suffered by her in her ribs and stomach to which the Doctor had replied in affirmative vide query report (Ex. P/15). Thereafter again on 28/05/2012, query had been made by the S.H.O. as to whether deceased had died due to strangulation to which the Doctor had replied vide query report (Ex. P/13) that tongue of the deceased was protruding and it was bitten by her teeth, however, since her body had decomposed and it had been damaged by maggots, no mark on her neck was visible and as such, no definite opinion can be given. Again on 29/05/2012, query was made by the S.H.O. as to whether the injuries suffered by the deceased could have been
Chenda @ Chanda Ram v. State of Chhattisgarh 2014 CrLJ 172
M.B. Suresh v. State of Karnataka
Rajender v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Rupinder Singh Sandhu v. State of Punjab and others
Under Section 299 of IPC, homicide becomes culpable when a human being terminates life of another in a blameworthy manner.
The prosecution must prove homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt; circumstantial evidence alone, including last seen theory, is insufficient for conviction.
Circumstantial evidence must constitute a complete chain to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in a murder case.
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder hinges on the offender's intention, with insufficient evidence of intent leading to a reduced sentence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.