SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Chh) 277

GOUTAM BHADURI, SANJAY S. AGRAWAL
Rostam @ Bablu S/o Nijamuddin Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : V.K. Pandey.
For the Respondent: Trivikram Nayak.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY S. AGRAWAL, J.

1. Since both these appeals have been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13.12.2019 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012), Pratappur, District Surajpur (C.G.) in Special Criminal Case No. 02/2019, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order.

2. In Rostam @ Bablu vs. State of Chhattisgarh, CRA No. 52/2020 the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:

Conviction

Sentence

U/s 363 of IPC

R.I. for 5 years and fine amount of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment to fine further R.I. for 3 months

U/s 366 A of IPC

R.I. for 7 years and fine amount of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine further R.I. for 3 months

U/s 376(2)(n) of IPC

Life imprisonment and fine amount of Rs. 2000/- and in default of payment of fine further R.I. for 6 months. All sentences directed to run concurrently.

Mesraj @ Misraj Ansari and Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh, CRA No. 127/2020 the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:

Conviction

Sentence

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top