RAMESH SINHA, RAJANI DUBEY
Pritam Kumar Paikra @ Pritam, S/o Shri Gopal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Per Rajani Dubey, J.
1. The appellants in these appeals under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) have challenged the validity, legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 23rd June, 2022 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Katghora, Distt. Korba in Sessions Trial No.35/2020 whereby the appellants stand convicted and sentenced as under:
| Conviction | Sentence |
| Under Section 302/34 of Indian Penal Code. | Life imprisonment, pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default thereof, to suffer additional RI for three months. |
| Under Section 354/34 of Indian Penal Code.
| Rigorous imprisonment for five years, pay a fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default thereof to suffer additional RI for one month. |
Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 6.5.2020 at around 10.00 pm the appellants went to the house of Prakash Paikra in drunken condition and enquired from his wife Usha Painkra about him, on which she told that he (Prakash Paikra) has gone to the hous
Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra [(1997) 5 SCC 341
Golla Yelugu Govindu v. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in (2008 (4) SCALE 569).
Nivrutti Pandurang Kokate and others V. State of Maharashtra reported in 2008 (12) SCC 565
Panchhi v. State of UP reported in (1998) 7 SCC 177
State of Karnataka v. Shantappa Madivalappa Galapuji & others reported in (2009) 12 SCC 731
Suryanarayana v. State of Karnataka (2001) 9 SCC 129
Surinder Kumar Vs. State of Haryana reported in (2011) 10 SCC 173
Murder of wife - Conviction upheld - Where an accused is alleged to have committed the murder of his wife and the prosecution succeeds in leading evidence to show that shortly before the commission o....
A dying declaration can serve as the sole basis for conviction if it is credible and corroborated, emphasizing its legal admissibility in murder cases.
The reliability and consistency of dying declarations are crucial in criminal cases, especially when multiple contradictory declarations are present.
Dying declarations must be coherent and trustworthy, free from influence to be valid for conviction; inconsistencies lead to benefit of doubt.
Oral dying declaration is admissible in evidence and there is no legal bar – There is no requirement of law that a dying declaration must necessarily be made to a Magistrate with certification of doc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.