IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
GOUTAM BHADURI, SANJAY S. AGRAWAL, JJ.
Phoolsai Khute S/o Bend Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA No.387 of 2021, CRA No.788 of 2021
Decided on : 21-08-2023
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 148, 302, 324, 149 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 209 - Member of unlawful assembly - Murder offence - Appeal against conviction - Appeals have been preferred against judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed – Held, Son of deceased was being assaulted by appellants and when it was intervened by his father, then, appellants started assaulting him and his uncle with aid of axe and lathi (stick), owing to which, they died on spot – Court thus hold that there was no pre-conceived common object of committing murder of deceased by these appellants - Accordingly, conviction of these appellants is hereby set aside and they are held to be liable and convicted only for offence punishable under Section 324 (two counts) IPC and sentence as awarded to them by Court below is hereby affirmed – Appeal allowed in part.
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay S. Agrawal, J.
1. Since both these appeals have been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27.02.2021 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti in Sessions Trial No.17/2017, they are being disposed of by this common order.
2. In Criminal Appeal No.788 of 2021, the appellants (Phoolsai, Shiv Prasad @ Selgu and Gomti) have been convicted and sentenced as under:-
| CONVICTION | SENTENCE |
| Under Section 148 of IPC | Rigorous imprisonment for one year and payment of fine of Rs.500/- to each of the appellants |
| Under Section 302 (Two count) of IPC | Life Imprisonment (on two count) and fine of Rs.5,000/- (on two count) to each of the appellants |
| Under Section 324/149 (Two count ) of IPC | One year Rigorous Imprisonment and fine of Rs.500/- (on two count) to each of the appellants |
|
| In default of payment of fine, each of the appellants have to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for 6 months All the sentences were directed to run concurrently |
3. In Criminal Appeal No.387 of 2021, the appellants (Amar Prasad and Tikam Prasad) have been convicted and sentenced as under:-
| CONVICTION | SENTENCE |
| Under Section 148 of IPC | Rigorous imprisonment for one year and payment of fine of Rs.500/- to each of the appellants |
| Under Section 302 (Two count ) of IPC | Life Imprisonment (on two count) and fine of Rs.5,000/- (on two count) to each of the appellants |
| Under Section 324/149 (Two count ) of IPC | One year Rigorous Imprisonment and fine of Rs.500/- (on two count) to each of the appellants |
|
| In default of payment of fine, each of the appellants have to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for 6 months. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently |
4. The facts, which are essential for adjudication of this appeal, are that on 13.03.2017 at about 3.30 PM at Village Kudri, Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa, the appellants (Phoolsai) and his family members and other accused persons in furtherance of their common object have formed unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons and committed the murder of Resham Lal Khunte and Mehettar Khunte and have injured Hira Lal, Gayatri Bai and Dhaneshwari with regard to the land dispute. A merg intimation was lodged by Dhaneshwari, the widow of Resham Lal Khunte with regard to the death of her husband and brother-in-law (Mehettar) on 13.03.2017 before the Police Station Dabhra vide Ex.P-3 & P-4, who in turn, registered the FIR (Ex.P-5) on 13.03.2017 against the accused persons namely Phoolsai, Shiv Prasad, Gomti Bai, Kanhaiya, Laxmi, Amar Prasad and Tikam Prasad and Chhotu under Section 147, 148, 149, 307 and 302 of IPC in connection with Crime No.86 of 2017. Inquest of the dead body of Resham Lal and Mehettar was conducted on 13.03.2017 vide Ex.P-17 and Ex.P-18 and spot map was prepared on 08.11.2017 Vide Ex.P.1. The injured Hira Lal and Dhaneshwari Bai were sent for their medical examinations. The dead body of Resham Lal and Mehettar was sent for autopsy on 13.03.2017, which was conducted by Dr. Hemant Kumar Sahu, (PW-11), who opined that the cause of death was due to cardio-respiratory failure vide Postmortem Report (Ex.P-20 & P-21), as a result of shock and hemorrhage and, accordingly cause of death was opined to be homicidal in nature. On the basis of disclosure statements of the appellants, an iron rod was recovered from the appellant-Phoolsai vide Seizure Memo (Ex.P-36) and an axe was recovered from his son Shiv Prasad and wife Gomti Bai vide Seizure Memos Ex.P-35 & P-34, respectively and lathi (stick) was recovered from the appellants-Amar Prasad and Tikam Prasad vide Seizure Memos Ex.P-33 & P-32 respectively. The alleged articles were sent for its chemical examinations and Forensic Science Laboratory Report was thereupon submitted vide Ex.P-52.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 149 IPC to determine the common object of the unlawful assembly and the vicarious liability of the accused, as well as t....
Section 141 of IPC states that an “unlawful assembly” is an assembly of five or more persons, if their common object is to commit mischief, criminal trespass or any other offence.
The evidence must establish a premeditated intent to commit murder and the existence of an unlawful assembly with the common object of committing murder to support a conviction for murder under Secti....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove the constitution of an unlawful assembly and the applicability of vicarious liability under Section 149 of IPC.
In cases of unlawful assembly leading to murder, all involved members can be held vicariously liable, and eyewitness testimonies must be credible even if witnesses are related to the victim.
Point of Law : Unlawful assembly – Common object - No doubt section 149 IPC is wide in its sweep but in fixing the membership of the unlawful assembly and in inferring the common object various circu....
The court established that in cases of unlawful assembly, all members can be held vicariously liable for the actions taken in furtherance of a common object, and that the prosecution's failure to exp....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.