IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAJANI DUBEY, J.
J.K. Mehta, S/o. Shri H.P. Mehta - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education and Ors. - Respondents
WPS No. 2458 of 2016
Decided On : 09-01-2024
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION - EMPLOYMENT DISPUTE - Chhattisgarh Vishvavidhyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973, University Grants Commission Guidelines - The court discussed the petitioner's educational qualifications and the rules governing the absorption of employees in government service. It highlighted the petitioner's eligibility based on the prescribed qualifications and the relaxation provided for Ph.D. holders. The court emphasized the principles of natural justice, promissory estoppel, and legitimate expectation in reaching its decision. The court also referred to the case of K. GOPINATHAN v/s UNION OF INDIA to support its decision.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an Assistant Professor in Sociology, sought to set aside an order that absorbed his services in government service on an adhoc and temporary basis, depriving him of regular government servant benefits. The petitioner argued that he met the educational qualifications and was entitled to absorption with equal benefits.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was eligible for absorption based on his educational qualifications and the relaxation provided for Ph.D. holders. It held that the order of absorption was passed in violation of principles of natural justice, promissory estoppel, and legitimate expectation.
Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's eligibility for absorption in government service and the deprivation of regular government servant benefits despite meeting the prescribed qualifications.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the petitioner's eligibility as per the prescribed qualifications, the relaxation provided for Ph.D. holders, and the violation of principles of natural justice, promissory estoppel, and legitimate expectation.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition, setting aside the order of absorption and directing the respondents to absorb the petitioner's services as an Assistant Professor in Sociology with equal benefits extended to other Assistant Professors in government service.
ORDER :
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following reliefs:
(ii) That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.”
2. Brief facts of the case as projected by the petitioner are that, the petitioner was appointed as lecturer in department of Sociology in the Gramya Bharti Vidyapeeth, Hardi Bazaar Bilaspur, against the vacant and sanctioned post vide order dated 30.10.1983 in the pay scale of 700-1300-1600/- after following due process of selection enumerated in statute no. 28 known as College Code of the then Guru Ghasidas University Bilaspur. Accordingly the petitioner joined in 14.11.1983 under the provisions of C.G. Vishvavidyalaya Adhiniyam. Initially the petitioner was appointed on probation for period of 1 year however after completing the probation period of 1 year satisfactorily, the service of the petitioner was confirmed and became effective from the date of 14.11.1984.
3. The petitioner had passed his schooling in the year 1972 with more than 50%, B.Sc examination in the year 1975 with more than 50% marks, M.A. in the year 1977 in Sociology subject with 51.7%, M. Phil in the year 1978, B.Ed in the year 1980, LL.B in the year 1993, LLM in the year 2013 with 55.8% and also completed Ph.D in the year 1998. Apart from above qualifications the petitioner had conducted research projects funded by International Fund for Agriculture Development, a body of United Nations Organization, in association with Chhattisgarh Tribunal Development Society, a bonafide society of Chhattisgarh Government, also published research papers in National journals, guided Ph.D. students, acting as Chief Editor of research journal namely, Sociology Quest, Life member of Indian Sociology Society, executive member of Delhi and central zone Sociology Promotion Council and President of Chhattisgarh Sociological Association.
4. After the confirmation of service the Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya had duly granted approval in accordance with law vide letter dated 19.09.1988. Vide order dated 07.02.1989, the Madhya Pradesh Uccha Shiksha Anudan Ayog had also granted approval of petitioner as regular Assistant Professor Sociology from 01.03.1988 for grant of aid. Accordingly, the petitioner is getting the pay scale fixed by the Directorate Madhya Pradesh Uccha Shiksha Anudan Ayog regularly and as on 01.09.1992, the petitioner was paid scale of Rs. 2200-4000/-. Thereafter, vide circular/order dated 08.07.1993, the M.P. Uccha Shiksha Anudan Ayog directed in accordance with Higher Education Department notification dated 03/08 November 1988, that the Assistant Professors appointed in approved colleges in regular basis after selection, after completing 8 years from 01.01.1986 shall be entitled to be promoted in senior pay scale of University Grants Commission of Rs. 3000-5000/-. Accordingly the petitioner was granted promotion in senior pay scale grade vide order dated 05.07.1994 with effect from March 1993. The pay scale of the petitioner was upgraded according to the recommendation of 5th Pay Commission in Rs. 12000-18300/-, by order dated 13.08.2004 effective from 27.07.1998.
5. Thereafter, the petitioner was included in the pay scale of Rs. 37400-67000 with AGP 9000 after applying recommendation of 6th pa
The main legal point established in the judgment is the eligibility of the petitioner for absorption in government service based on his educational qualifications and the violation of principles of n....
The judgment establishes that an employee meeting the required qualifications should be entitled to absorption with equal benefits, and basic pay cannot be reduced.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exclusive power and jurisdiction of the University in the matter of absorption of staff of constituent colleges, as provided in Section 4(1)(14....
The University had the power to adjust the petitioner and respondent No. 6, and they were entitled to all benefits, including retiral benefits and pay-scale revision.
The university has exclusive authority over faculty absorption and regularization based on commission recommendations, and previous government notifications remain valid.
Finality of administrative decisions in educational governance ensures adherence to past judgments regarding teacher absorption without arbitrary delays or changes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.