IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL, J.
Ranjana, W/o Late Bhagirathi – Appellant
Versus
Nohar Singh, S/o Sumer Singh –Respondent
MAC No. 361 of 2021
Decided on : 02-11-2023
Motor Accident Claim - Compensation - Motor Vehicles Act - Section 166 - 166, 168, 170 - The court discussed the computation of deceased's income, grant of future prospects, and loss of consortium. The court referred to the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd Versus Pranay Sethi and Magma General Insurance Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram and others to determine the compensation. The court modified the impugned award and allowed the appeal in part.
Fact of the Case:
The claimants appealed against the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, seeking higher compensation for the death of the deceased in a motor accident. The deceased was earning Rs.9,000 per month and died due to injuries sustained in the accident.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Tribunal had wrongly computed the deceased's income and failed to grant compensation for future prospects and loss of consortium. The court referred to relevant legal provisions and Supreme Court decisions to modify the award and allow the appeal in part.
Issues: The issues included the computation of deceased's income, grant of future prospects, and loss of consortium.
Ratio Decidendi: The court re-evaluated the deceased's income, granted compensation for future prospects based on the decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd Versus Pranay Sethi, and awarded compensation for loss of consortium in accordance with the principles outlined in Magma General Insurance Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram and others.
Final Decision: The court modified the impugned award and allowed the appeal in part, awarding higher compensation to the claimants.
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal is by the claimants against the award dated 30.01.2021 passed by Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pratappur, District Surajpur, C.G. in Motor Accident Claim Case No.20/2019, awarding total compensation of Rs.5,16,000/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of application till its realization, fastening liability on the Insurance Company, driver and owner jointly and severally. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall hereinafter be referred to as per their description before the Tribunal.
2. As per averments made in the claim petition, on 16.11.2018 at about 4:30 pm, deceased-Vikas Gupta, aged about 18 years, earning Rs.9,000/- per month by working as Khalasi/ Helper in Balaji Poultry Farm, after loading chickens/ Hen in vehicle 407 bearing registration No.CG15-DA-9816 (hereinafter referred as 'offending vehicle) was going from Orissa to Wadrafnagar in offending vehicle along with non-applicant No.1 Nohar Singh, driver of offending vehicle. However, on the way, non-applicant No.1/driver of the offending vehicle by driving the same in a rash and negligent manner, dashed the offending vehicle at the pole, as a result of which, deceased fell down from the offending vehicle and sustained grievous injuries over his body and died on the spot. At the time of accident, the offending vehicle was owned by non-applicant no.2 and insured with non-applicant no.3.
3. On claim petition being filed by the claimants under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act to the tune of Rs.14,90,500/-, the Tribunal considering the evidence led by both the parties passed an award as mentioned above.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants/claimants submits that though he has raised various grounds in the memo of appeal, however, he is not pressing all those grounds and is assailing the award on the following grounds:-
(ii) that no amount towards future prospects has been granted to the claimants.
(iii) that no amount has been granted by the Tribunal to the claimants under loss of consortium, which deserves to be enhanced suitably.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent No.3/ Insurance Company supported the impugned award and submits that the Tribunal considering all the relevant aspects of the matter has rightly awarded compensation, which needs no interference by this Court.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
7. As regards the income of the deceased, the claimants have pleaded that the deceased was earning Rs.9,000/- per month by working as Khalasi/ Helper in Balaji Poultry Farm and for proving the said fact, claimants have filed Salary Certificate of deceased (Ex.P-17), wherein it is mentioned that deceased was working as Khalasi/ Helper in Balaji Poultry Farm and was getting Rs.9,000/-per month and other subsistence allowance from the said farm, but the learned Tribunal did not consider the above fact and assessed the monthly income of deceased at Rs.4,500/- per month, which in the considered opinion of this Court is not reasonable. I, therefore, propose to recompute the income of the deceased by taking into account the fact that the accident occurred on 16.11.2018, at that time, deceased was a young boy, aged about 18 years, his income can safely be taken as Rs.6,000/- per month on notional basis.
8. Further, the Tribunal was not justified in ignoring the grant of future prospects to the claimants as on the date of accident i.e. 16.11.2018, deceased was aged about 18 years, unmarried and on account of the injuries suffered in the accident, he died. In such a situation, the Tribunal ought to have awarded compensation to the claimants in the head of future prospects in vi
National Insurance Co. Ltd Versus Pranay Sethi reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of compensation in motor accident claims, including the computation of deceased's income, grant of future prospects, and compensa....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the proper assessment of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, taking into account the deceased's income, future prospects, and loss of con....
The court applied the principles established in Magma General Insurance Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram and National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi to re-assess the compensation for th....
The main legal point established is the importance of assessing 'just and fair' compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 168, based on income tax returns and legal precedents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.