SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Chh) 633

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
GOUTAM BHADURI, DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI, JJ.
Smt. Rainpreet Kaur, W/o. Kulbir Singh Chhabra - Appellant
Versus
Kulbir Chhabra, S/o. Shri Gurucharan Chhadra - Respondent
FAM No. 219 Of 2017
Decided On : 16-10-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sumesh Bajaj and Mr. Rishabh Bajaj, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Anup Majumdar and Mr. Saket Pandey, Adv.

Headnote:

Desertion - Divorce - [Bipinchandra Jaisinghbai Shah v Prabhavati, AIR 1957 SC 176] - The court discussed the legal principles of desertion, emphasizing the intentional permanent forsaking and abandonment of one spouse by the other without consent and without reasonable cause. The court also highlighted the need for corroboration and the importance of the intention to bring cohabitation permanently to an end.

Fact of the Case:

The husband sought a divorce on the ground of desertion, alleging that the wife left the matrimonial home. The wife denied the allegations and attributed cruelty to the husband. The Family Court granted a decree of divorce to the husband based on desertion and cruelty.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the husband failed to fully establish desertion and that the allegations of cruelty attributed to the wife could not be sustained. The court also dismissed the applications for mutual divorce and granted the wife Rs.45,000 per month as maintenance.

Issues: The primary issue was the ground of desertion and the allegations of cruelty. The court also addressed the applications for mutual divorce and maintenance.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the legal principles of desertion, the need for corroboration, and the intention to bring cohabitation permanently to an end. It also considered the financial capacity of the husband and the wife's entitlement to maintenance.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the order granting the decree of divorce was set aside. The court ordered the husband to pay Rs.45,000 per month to the wife as maintenance.

JUDGMENT :

(Goutam Bhaduri, J.) :

1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and decree dated 26.10.2017 passed by the Family Court, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG), in Civil Suit No.29A/2013, wherein, a decree of divorce is granted to the husband on the ground of desertion. The issues were framed on the ground of desertion as to whether the wife/appellant has left the husband without any lawful clause and it was answered in affirmative. In the averments made in body of the impugned order, one of the grounds of cruelty was also made, which was at the behest of the wife to the husband. The wife being aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, has preferred this appeal.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the parties were married on 29.11.2002 and out of their wedlock, a male child was born namely Sehaj Singh Chhabra. It was alleged that after the marriage, the wife hardly resided with her husband for a period of three years and since 13.8.2010, she has been residing in her parental home. It was further stated by the husband that he being the only son of his parents, had to look after them, however, the wife insisted him to live separately from them and further, according to her wishes, they resided separately but the issue did not resolve. Eventually, on 13.8.2010, a social meeting was called in a Gurudwara at Rajnandgaon at the behest of the wife and her parents. On the said date, the husband and his family members could not remain present, therefore, a subsequent date of 18.8.2010 was given to them. On 18.8.2010, the husband and his family were present but the wife and his family members were not present and thereby, all the efforts of reunion failed. Consequently, both the husband and wife have been residing separately since 13.8.2010 and on this ground, a decree of divorce was sought for. In response to the averments, the wife alleged that she was subjected to indecent behaviour and abusive language by the husband and he also used to beat her frequently but she endured all this to save her married life and continued to bear such torture and misbehaviour with a hope that one day such behavior of her husband will improve and everything will be alright. She further stated that she was left along at the old house and all the family members moved to another house and thereby, she was deserted by the husband, who extended physical and mental cruelty to her, therefore, no ground existed to grant a decree of divorce to the husband.

3. The Family Court, on the basis of pleadings, framed the issues solely on the ground of desertion. The issues so framed are reproduced hereunder :

Sl. No.

Issues

Result

1.

Whether without completing marital life with petitioner the respondent has gone to her parental home without any reasonable reason?

“Proved”

2.

Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree for dissolution of marriage solemnized between parties on 29.11.2002

“Proved”

3.

Relief (help and litigation expenses)?

In para 18 & 19

4. The husband examined himself as PW-1 and one Yashpal Singh Bhatia (PW-2), who was the Secretary of Gurudwara Samiti, Rajnandgaon, whereas, the wife examined herself as DW-1 and her father as DW-2 Darshan Singh Chawla. Apart from the above, two other witnesses were also examined. A long list of documents has been exhibited from Ex.D/1 to Ex.D/63. The learned Family Court after evaluation of the evidence available on record, passed the decree in favour of the respondent-husband. Hence, this appeal.

5. (I) Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the evidence which has been led by the husband would show that it is because of the beatings extended by the husband and also his misbehaviour, the wife used to reside separately. He went through the statement of DW-1 -wife to submit that prior to 13.8.2010, she had been beaten severely by the husband and in cons

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top