JUDGMENT :

1. The Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India feeling aggrieved by the improper procedure in respect of deleting question or not deleting the improper question or having the correct given options, for the written examination conducted for the post of Naib Tahsildar to be filled from Revenue Inspector/Patwari, which was held on 20.07.2014.

2. Brief facts of the case, as projected by the Petitioner, are that an advertisement No.F-2-61/Saat-2/2007, Raipur Dated 04.03.2014 (Annexure P/1) was published for 57 posts of Naib Tahsildar in which 28 posts are to be filled from Revenue Inspectors & Patwari Cadre and 20 from Clerks Cadre. The date of written examination was fixed for 20.07.2014. The Petitioner has duly appeared in the written examination and thereafter the model answer were declared vide dated 31.07.2014 by the Respondent Controller, Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board (in short Vyapam). The Petitioner has got Set-B (Annexure P/2) and in respect of question No.28, which is quoted below for ready reference:

"28. Who among the following was the first recipient of Padmashri honour of this state?

(A) Pt. Mukutdhar Pandey

(B)