Back
RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Ram Naraya Sahu S/o Late Shri Mahettar Lal Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard.
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief (s):-
10.2 That, any other relief, which Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, may also be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice. An affidavit in support of this application is filed herewith.
2. The facts of the present case are that the petitioner was initially appointed to the post of Assistant Teacher in the year 2005 and was posted at Govt. Girls Middle School Charcha, Dist.-Korea (C.G.). Thereafter, he was transferred to Govt. Sadar Primary School Janjgir, Dist.-Janjgir-Champa (C. G.) in the year 2015. The petitioner has not been granted the benefits of promotion/kramonnati till date.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the service condition of the petitioner would be governed by the Chhattisgarh Shikshak (Nagriya Nikay) Samvarg (Bharti Tatha Sewa Ki Sharte) Niyam, 2013. He would f
Belated service claims for pay increments rejected due to unexplained delay, laches and acquiescence; prolonged inaction implies consent, barring relief to uphold administrative finality.
Delay and laches bar service claims, particularly where acquiescence and potential impact on third-party rights are involved.
Point of Law : Doctrine of delay and laches should not be lightly brushed aside. A writ court is required to weigh the explanation offered and the acceptability of the same. The court should bear in ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
