IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Radhakishan Agrawal, J.
Smt. Bhagtin Bai, W/o Mahaveer Kumar Sonwani - Appellant
Vs.
Sanjay Suryawanshi, S/o Jageshwar Suryawanshi - Respondent
MAC No. 820 of 2019, MAC No. 1204 of 2019
Decided On : 19-04-2024
Motor Vehicles Act - Liability - 166 - 304-A IPC
Fact of the Case:
The judgment concerns two appeals arising from the same accident. One appeal seeks compensation for the death of the deceased, while the other seeks compensation for injuries sustained by the claimant. The deceased was driving a motorcycle when he was involved in a collision with a moped. The claimants and the insurance companies were parties to the appeals.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the moped by its owner, leading to the death of the deceased. The court held the insurance company liable to pay compensation to the claimant in one appeal, while dismissing the claim in the other appeal due to the claimant's negligent driving.
Issues: The main issues revolved around the liability of the insurance companies and the claimants' driving conduct, leading to the determination of compensation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Motor Vehicles Act and Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code to establish liability. It emphasized the need for the insurance companies to prove breach of policy conditions and the fundamental contribution of such breaches to the accident to avoid liability.
Final Decision: The court allowed one appeal in part, holding the insurance company liable to pay compensation, and dismissed the other appeal due to the claimant's negligent driving.
JUDGMENT ON BOARD :
1. Since both the appeals filed by the different claimants arise out of same accident that took place on 20.10.2015, therefore, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.
2. As per averments made in the claim petition filed by the Smt. Bhaktin Bai, claimant in MACT No.540/2017, on 20.10.2015, when deceased- Rohit Kumar Sonwani was going towards Ratanpur on his pulsar motorcycle bearing registration No.CG28-9554 (hereafter called as 'pulsar bike'). However, on the way, when he reached near Kanan Pindari, at that time, Sanjay Sooryavanshi/non-applicant No.1 by driving TVS moped bearing registration No.CG10-Y-0756 (hereinafter referred to as ‘offending vehicle TVS moped’) in a rash and negligent manner, came from opposite side and dashed against the pulsar bike of Rohit Kumar Sonwani, as a result of which, deceased-Rohit Kumar Sonwani sustained grievous injuries over his body and succumbed to the same. At the time of accident, the offending vehicle TVS moped was insured with non-applicant No.2 Bharti Axa Insurance Company Limited.
3. As per averments made in the claim petition filed by the Sanjay Sooryavanshi, claimant, in MACT No.564/2016, on 20.10.2015, when claimant-Sanjay Sooryavanshi, after completing his work was going towards his village Pendri via Bilaspur, Takhatpur, Main Road, on offending vehicle TVS moped and suddenly his mobile phone rang, then he stopped the offending vehicle TVS moped and was talking on the side of road, at that time, driver of the pulsar bike (deceased-Rohit Sonwani) by driving the same in a rash and negligent manner, dashed the offending vehicle TVS moped from back side, as a result of which, he sustained grievous injuries over his body, due to said injuries, he was admitted in CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur and thereafter, he was referred to Mundra Hospital, Bilaspur for better treatment where he remained from 21.10.2015 till 24.10.2015. In the said accident, the driver of pulsar bike (Rohit Kumar Sonwani) has died. At the time of accident, the pulsar bike was insured with non-applicant No.1 i.e. Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited and non-applicant No.2 has been arrayed as legal heirs of deceased-Rohit Kumar Sonwani.
4. On account of death of deceased-Rohit Kumar Sonwani, a claim petition (MACT No.540/2017) was filed by the claimant under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking compensation to the tune of Rs.22,70,000/- inter alia pleading that at the time of accident, deceased- Rohit Kumar Sonwani was aged about 19 years and was earning Rs.10,000/- per month by working as driver. The said claim petition was registered as MACT No.540/2017, in which, vide impugned award dated 07.03.2019, learned 6th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur, after considering the evidence available on record, awarded a compensation of Rs.9,77,200/- to the claimant with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of application till its realization and fastened the liability upon the non- applicant No.1 i.e. Sanjay Sooryavanshi, driver and owner of the offending vehicle TVS moped while exonerating non-applicant No.2/Insurance Company-Bhartiya Axa Insurance Company Ltd. Hence, the claimant preferred an appeal seeking enhancement of compensation as well as fastening liability upon the Insurance Company.
5. Similarly, on account of injuries sustained by the claimant-Sanjay Sooryavanshi in the same accident, a claim petition (MACT No.564/2016) was filed by him under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking compensation to the tune of Rs.35,00,000/- inter alia pleading that at the time of accident, injured-Sanjay Sooryavanshi was aged about 22 years and was earning Rs.10-12,000/- per month by working in H.P. Gas Company, Bilaspur. The said claim petition was registered as MACT No.564/2016, in which, vide impugned award dated 17.05.2019, learned 6th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur, after considering the evidence available
The judgment establishes the principle that insurance companies must prove breach of policy conditions and its fundamental contribution to the accident to avoid liability under the Motor Vehicles Act....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle of 'pay and recover' in case of third-party risks and the requirement for the insurer to prove the driver's lack of a valid driving l....
The judgment establishes the principle that the insurer must prove breach of policy conditions and negligence of the insured to absolve itself of liability, emphasizing the need for cogent evidence t....
The insurance company must prove the breach of policy conditions to avoid liability, and the burden of proof regarding the driver's license validity lies with the insurer.
The insurance company must prove any breach of policy conditions to avoid liability for compensation claims.
The insurance company is exonerated from liability for compensation as the driver lacked a valid driving license, establishing a breach of policy conditions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.