IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS, J.
Sunil Kumar Agrawal, S/o Late Mohan Lal Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement Government of India – Respondent
MCRC No. 402 of 2024
Decided on : 08-04-2024
ORDER :
1. This is second bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested on 13.10.2022 in connection with Crime No. ECIR/RPZO/09/2022 dated 29.09.2022 registered at Police Station-Directorate of Enforcement, Zonal Office, Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 3 & 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short “the PMLA, 2002”).
2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 12.07.2022, FIR No. 129/2022 was registered by Kadugodi Police Station, Whitefield, Bengaluru under Sections 186, 204, 353 & 120B of IPC against one Suryakant Tiwari & other persons on the basis of complaint filed by Deputy Director of Income Tax, Foreign Assets Investigation Unit-I Bengaluru alleging that as part of conspiracy, during course of search by Income Tax department on 30.06.2022, Suryakant Tiwari had obstructed the officials from carrying their official duties and destroyed crucial incriminating documents and digital evidence about the alleged illegal extortion on Coal Transportation, payments collected by Suryakant Tiwari and his associates.
3. It is also case of the prosecution that on 13.09.2022, OM in F. No. 22-IT was forwarded by Central Board of Direct Taxes (for short “CBDT”) to the Directorate of Enforcement containing the FIR No. 1292022 Police Station- Kadugodi along with a report on the investigation conducted by the Income Tax Department on M/s Jay Ambey Group of Raipur (Suryakant Tiwari Group). In the report, it has been mentioned that during search operations on 30.06.2023 by Income Tax Department on the premises of Suryakant Tiwari and his associates, evidence was gathered related to a syndicated being operated and coordinated by Suryakant Tiwari whereby additional unauthorized cash to the tune of Rs. 25 per ton of coal was being collected over and above the legal amount against Coal Delivery Orders. It has also been alleged that pursuant to the Order F.No.4138-47/Sankhikiya/Coal bhandaran/N.Kra 2020 dated 15.07.2020 issued by the State Government the dispatch rules of coal mines by authorities have been changed from an online process to introduction of manual verification. The said notification was issued under the signatures of one Sameer Vishnoi, IAS who was the Director, Geology & Mining as well as MD of CMDC. It is also case of the prosecution that it is only after the said notification Suryakant Tiwari in conspiracy with certain other persons started obtaining an illegal levy of Rs. 25 per ton of coal for issuance of delivery order for coal transportation. The handwritten diaries maintained by one Rajnikant Tiwari who is brother of Suryakant Tiwari contained entries of incoming and outgoing amounts of unaccounted cash generated, inter alia from illegal levy on coal transport revealed profits of more than Rs. 500 crores in 16 months from different kinds of levies. On 29.09.2022, ECIR/RPZ0/09/2022 was registered by Directorate of Enforcement, Raipur Zonal Office for commission of offence under Sections 120 (B) & 384 of IPC being a part of FIR No. 129/2022.
4. The role of the present applicant is that the present applicant who is promoter of M/s Indermani Group having a close relationship with Suryakant Tiwari. Investigation revealed that the applicant had helped Suryakant Tiwari in acquiring coal washeries from M/s Indus Udyog & Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. and Ms. Satya Power and Ispat Ltd. These coal washeries were acquired for an amount of Rs. 96 crore, out of which Rs. 34 crore was registered value and was paid through banking channel and rest of the amount was to be paid in cash. Thus, large amount of illegally acquired cash was layered in these transactions. After the IT raids, the applicant made stamp paper transactions to show that he was the owner of these 2 washeries which were nothing but a futile attempt to alienate the ill-gotten proceeds of crime and take them far away from arms of Inco
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate Of Enforcement
Sanjay Chandra Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation
State of Bihar Vs. Amit Kumar reported in (2017) 13 SCC 751
State Of Rajasthan Vs. Balchand
Dataram Singh Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh
Sujit Tiwari Vs. State Of Gujarat
Union Of India Vs. K.A. Najeeb
Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Vs. Cbi
Arnab Manoranjan Goswami Vs. State Of Maharashtra & Others
The court emphasized that in economic offences under the PMLA, bail is not granted unless the accused proves they are not guilty and unlikely to commit further offences.
The court emphasized that in economic offences, especially under the PMLA, bail should not be granted unless the accused demonstrates they are not guilty and unlikely to commit further offences.
An individual can be prosecuted under the PMLA, even if not directly involved in the scheduled offence, and the gravity of economic offences needs to be considered in the matter of bail. The court al....
The court emphasized that bail under the PMLA requires satisfaction of twin conditions regarding the accused's guilt and likelihood of committing further offences, which were not met in this case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the twin conditions under Section 45 of PMLA must be satisfied before granting bail in a money laundering case, and the accused's involvement ....
The gravity of economic offences, potential influence on witnesses and evidence, and the failure to satisfy the twin conditions for bail under Section 45 of the PMLA were central to the court's decis....
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception, especially in serious economic offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, where the gravity of charges necessitates stringent scrutiny.
The court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 as there were no reasonable grounds for believing that she had committed an off....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.