US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Small Scale Ice Cream Manufacturer Association (Reg. ) Through Vice President, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Through its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-
10.B That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned recommendations of the GST Council being void ab initio.
10.C That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to strike down the impugned notification no 8/2017- Central Tax dated 27.06.2017 (Annexure P/1) holding it to be ultravires.
10.D Any other relief this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may be passed.”
2. Petitioner No. 1 is Small Scale Ice Cream Manufacturer Association and Petitioner No. 2 is its Vice President. It is pleaded in the petition that the petitioners were subjected to various taxes like VAT, Service Tax, Luxury Tax etc., however with the enforcement of the Goods and Service Tax Act (GST), various Central and State Taxes were unified. The main feature of the scheme
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for reasonable classification in taxation laws, as mandated by Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The court emphasized the ne....
Exemptions under G.O.Ms. No. 1091 are general under state law but do not qualify as general exemptions under the Central Sales Tax Act due to specific conditions in the exemption notification.
The court ruled that imposing both Late Fees and General Penalties for GST return delays is improper; Late Fee suffices under applicable rules, reflecting legislative intent for compliance, not punit....
(1) Estoppel – There cannot be any estoppel against Government in exercise of its sovereign, legislative and executive functions.
(2) Court cannot interfere in policy matters of Government unless ....
Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, which restricted refunds of IGST on exports where benefits of certain notifications were availed, was declared void for future cases following its omission by new legis....
The court determined that taxation under the General Sales Tax Act does not directly impede trade as it levies tax on sales, not movement, affirming that indirect effects on trade do not violate cons....
Aashirwad Films vs. Union of India & Others reported in (2007) 6 SCC 624
-
Read summaryAyurveda Pharmacy and another vs. State of T.N. reported in (1989) 2 SCC 2851
-
Read summaryM/s. East India Tobacco Co.
-
Read summaryMoopil Nair v. State of Kerala
-
Read summaryEast India Tobacco Co. v. State of Andhra Pradesh
-
Read summaryV. Venugopala Ravi Varma Rajah v. Union of India and Anr.
-
Read summaryAssistant Director of Inspection Investigation v. Kum. A.B. Shanthi
-
Read summaryThe Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Anr.
-
Read summarySri Srinivasa Theatre and Ors. v. Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
-
Read summaryAdhyaksha Mathur Babus Sakti Oushadhalaya Dacca (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.