IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ., Arvind Kumar Verma, J.
Gopal Kerketta S/o Brijlal Kerketta - Appellant
Vs.
The State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur (C.G.) - Respondent
CRA No. 1968 of 2023
Decided On : 22-03-2024
Conviction - Criminal Procedure - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - 366A IPC, 450 IPC, 376(3) IPC, 4 of POSCO Act - 366A, 450, 376(3), 4 of POSCO Act - The court discussed the legal provisions related to the age of the victim, the definition of 'child' under the POCSO Act, and the significance of victim's age in cases of sexual offences. The court also highlighted the importance of the victim's testimony and the principle of conviction based on the sole testimony of the victim.
Fact of the Case:
The victim alleged that the accused trespassed into her residence, abducted her, and committed sexual assault. The prosecution presented evidence including witness testimonies, medical reports, and documentary evidence to support the victim's claims.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the accused guilty based on the victim's testimony, witness statements, and medical evidence. The court emphasized the credibility and trustworthiness of the victim's testimony and upheld the conviction without further corroboration.
Issues: The key issues included the age of the victim, the credibility of the victim's testimony, and the guilt of the accused in committing sexual assault.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the principle that conviction can be based on the sole testimony of the victim if found trustworthy and credible. The court also emphasized that seeking corroboration of the victim's statement before relying upon it amounts to adding insult to injury.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant/convict was ordered to serve the sentence awarded by the trial Court.
JUDGMENT :
Arvind Kumar Verma, J.
1. The appellant has filed this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, the Cr.P.C.) questioning the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.09.2023 passed in Special Sessions Case No. 70 of 2021 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.), whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:-
| Conviction under Section | Sentence (Rigorous imprisonment) | Fine | In default of payment of fine additional rigorous imprisonment |
| 366A IPC | 6 years | Rs. 200/- | 06 months |
| 450 IPC | 10 years | Rs. 200/- | 06 months |
| 376(3) IPC | 20 years | Rs. 200/- | 06 months |
| 4 of POSCO Act | 20 years | Rs. 200/- | 06 months |
| All sentences have been directed to run concurrently and Sentences already undergone to be adjusted. | |||
2. Case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 03.09.2021, the applicant/victim has lodged a written report (Ex.P-8) in Police Station – Ramanjunagar to the effect that on 02.09.2021 at around 07.00 pm, while she was washing utensils in the courtyard of the house, the accused entered her house, caught hold of her, dragged her into the bush behind her house covering her mouth with his hand and committed rape on her and when she screamed “Dai-Dai”, save me, her father came and caught the accused after hearing her voice. Based on the written report of the applicant (Ex.P-8), First Information Report No. 153/2021 was registered by Police Station – Ramanujnagar under Section 366, 376(3), 450 of IPC and Section 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short ‘the POCSO Act’) vide Ex.P-9. Subsequently, on 04.09.2021, after arrest of the accused and completion of investigation, charge-sheet No.128/2021 has been submitted before the concerned trial Court.
3. The learned Special Court framed charges against the appellant under Section 366A, 376(3), 450 of IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, the appellant denied the charges and prayed for trial.
4. Amongst others, the prosecution has exhibited the following documents in support of its case:
- Property Seizure Memo (Exhibit P/2)
- Consent Letter (Exhibit P/3)
- Spot map (Exhibit P/4)
- Property Seizure Memo (Exhibit P/5)
- Consent Letter of Prosecutrix (Exhibit P/6)
- Punchnama(Exhibit P/7)
- Complaint Letter of Prosecutrix (Exhibit P/8)
- First Information Report (Exhibit P/9)
- Statement of Prosecutrix U/s. 164 of Cr.P.C. (Exhibit P/ 10)
- Order Sheet dated 06.09.2021 of JMFC (Exhibit P/11)
- Memo to Head Master providing of admission discharge register (Exhibit P/12)
- Property Seizure Memo (Exhibit P/13)
- Copy of Admission Discharge Register (Exhibit P/14)
- Supurdnama (Exhibit P/15)
- Certificate (Exhibit P/16)
- Medical Examination Report of Prosecutrix (Exhibit P/17)
- Examination Report of seized Cloth of prosecutrix (Exhibit P/18)
- Medical examination report of accused (Exhibit P/19)
- Examination Report of seized underwear of accused (Exhibit P/20)
- Notice U/s.91 of Cr.P.C. (Exhibit P/21)
- School Certificate of prosecutrix (Exhibit P/22)
- Memo to MO for Medical examination of prosecutrix (Exhibit P/23)
- Memo to MO for examination of seized cloth of prosecutrix (Exhibit P/24)
- Arrest/Court Surrender Memo (Exhibit P/25)
- Information of Arrest (Exhibit P/26)
- Memo to MO for Medical examination of accused (Exhibit P/27)
- Memo to BMO for examination of seized underwear of accused (Exhibit P/28)
- Memo to JMFC requesting to record the statement of prosecutrix U/s. 164 of the Cr.P.C. (Exhibit P/29)
- Memo to Tahsildar requesting for spot map (Exhibit P/30)
- Property Seizure Memo (Exhibit P/31)
- Memo to FSL for Chemical examination of seized articles (Exhibit P/32)
- Receipt of Exhibits (Exhibit P/33)
- Copy of Seized Articles Register (Exhibit P/34)
- Application to Tahsildar furnishing the spot map (Exhibit P/35)
5. In order to bring home the offence, prosecutio
Mahadev Vs. State of Maharashtra (2013) 14 SCC 637
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on the sole testimony of the victim in cases of sexual assault, emphasizing the credibility and trustworthiness of the victim's testim....
The sole testimony of a child victim can suffice for conviction if credible, and age determination must rely on conclusive evidence such as school records.
The court affirmed that a victim's credible testimony can suffice for conviction in sexual assault cases, even without corroborative medical evidence.
The court upheld the conviction under POCSO, confirming that credible victim testimony and medical evidence sufficiently established the appellant's guilt in the sexual assault of a minor.
The judgment establishes that the testimony of a minor victim, supported by medical and documentary evidence, can be sufficient to establish guilt in cases of sexual offenses.
The consent of a minor girl in case of sexual intercourse is immaterial and amounts to rape.
The judgment establishes the importance of proving the victim's age in cases of sexual offenses against minors and highlights the legal provisions under the POCSO Act and the Indian Penal Code for de....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.