Back
RAJANI DUBEY
Naveen Kumar Shrivastava, S/o. Late Harishankar Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
Chhattisgarh Text Book Corporation, Through Its Managing Director – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition praying for the following reliefs:-
2] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Supervisor in India Security Press, Ministry of Finance, Government of India in the year 1988. The petitioner was voluntarily retired in the year 2007 and thereafter he was sent on deputation in the Chhattisgarh text Book Corporation, where he had worked as Manager Printing till 14.01.2009. The advertisement was issued by Chhattisgarh Text Book Corporation for appointment on the post of Printing Manager, the petitioner was holding an experience and was also eligible for the post of printing manager. The petitioner has also applied for the said post and was selected as
Compulsory retirement is not a punishment and does not require a hearing under Article 311; it is based on the government's subjective satisfaction regarding public interest.
The order of compulsory retirement of a judicial officer under Rule 53(1) of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996, is not arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory, or mala fide if it is ....
The decision to compulsorily retire a government servant under FR 56(j) must be made in public interest, and judicial scrutiny is limited to cases of mala fide exercise of power or lack of evidence. ....
An order of compulsory retirement must be based on a thorough assessment of the entire service record of the employee, and if it casts a stigma or is based solely on disciplinary actions without cons....
Point of Law : Dispensation of justice is not only an onerous duty but has been considered as akin to discharge of a pious duty, and therefore, is a very serious matter. The standards of probity, con....
Point of Law : Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules is an extension of “Doctrine of Pleasure”, If the employer - Union of India is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by continuing an emp....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
