ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI
Ram Sumer – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. Thru Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Amit Bose learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Abhishek Bose learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.P.S. Chauhan learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. This writ petition is directed against the order of compulsory retirement passed by the Superintendent of Police Railways, Lucknow on 9.7.2019 whereby the petitioner having been treated to be deadwood was retired compulsorily from service by invoking the power under Rule 56 of the fundamental rules contained in Financial Hand Book(Volume II, Part II to IV). The material relevant to be considered is prescribed under Rule 56(2) of the U.P. Fundamental Rules and the same for ready reference is extracted here under :-
(a) any entries relating to any period before such Government
State of U.P. and others Vs. Raj Kishore Goyal
State of Gujarat v. Umedbhai M. Patel
Baikuntha Nath Das v. Chief District Medical Officer, Baripada
H.G. Venkatachaliah Setty v. Union of India
Pyare Mohan Lal v. State of Jharkhand
Ram Murti Yadav v. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.