RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Horilal Chouhan, S/o. Late Shrawan Kumar Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Co-Operative Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. removal of members from co-operative societies. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against removal based on statutory non-compliance. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. argument regarding lack of substantive rights. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. interpretation of applicable statutes and rules. (Para 11 , 13 , 18) |
| 5. power and authority of the registrar in regard to removals. (Para 12 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. court's legal interpretation of rights. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. nature of removal powers under rules. (Para 19) |
| 8. summary of judicial findings. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 9. process of handling elections in co-operative societies. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 10. legal conclusions regarding removal and rights of petitioners. (Para 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 11. final dismissal of petitions without costs. (Para 52 , 53) |
ORDER :
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J.
1. The above captioned Writ Petitions are directed against the order of removal issued by the Deputy Registrar, Co-Operative Societies in the month of December, 2023, in the exercise of the power conferred under Rule 43-B (3) of the Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Societies Rules, 1962 (for short, the Rules, 1962), whereby the petitioners who were earlier nominated/appointed as Prescribed Officers,
Veena Kumari Tandon v. Neelam Bhalla
M/s. Ispat Industries Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai
Ramji Bharti vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Cheviti Venkanna Yadav Vs. State of Telangana & others
Om Narain Agarwal and others v. Nagar Palika Shahjahanpur and others
H. Rajaiah and others v. State of Karnataka and another
Dharampal Satyapal Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise
"Doctrine of Pleasure" has its genesis under common law - A public servant could be dismissed from service by Crown at its pleasure.
The doctrine of pleasure does not permit arbitrary or capricious exercise of power by the State, and such actions must comply with principles of fairness and Article 14 of the Constitution.
The doctrine of pleasure allows for removal from office without notice or reason, provided it is not arbitrary, and does not apply to those holding civil posts under the Constitution.
The doctrine of pleasure permits removal from office without notice or reason, provided it is not arbitrary, and does not apply to those not holding civil posts under the Constitution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.