SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Chh) 523

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay K. Agrawal, Amitendra Kishore Prasad, JJ.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Madhya Pradesh- Appellant
Versus
Association of Physicians – Respondent
TAX C No. 49 of 2019
Decided On : 19-09-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Mool Chand Jain, Advocate through video conferencing and Mr. Vijay Shanker Mishra, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
The Commissioner of Income Tax cannot assess the genuineness of a trust's activities against its books of accounts at the registration stage under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act.

Headnote:

(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 12AA – Tax appeal regarding registration of charitable trust – The ITAT directed the CIT to grant registration despite the CIT's concerns about the genuineness of the trust's activities, relying on precedent from Chhattisgarh Urology Society case – The court found no substantial question of law arising from the appeal. (Paras 1, 2, 8, 9)

(B) Legal Standards – The Commissioner must assess the genuineness of activities but cannot evaluate the trust's objects against its books of accounts at the registration stage. (Paras 8, 10, 11, 12)

Facts of the case: The Association of Physicians applied for registration under Section 12AA, which was rejected by the CIT, leading to an appeal to the ITAT that reversed the CIT's decision based on prior case law.

Findings of Court: The ITAT's order was upheld, confirming that the trust's objectives were charitable and the appeal lacked substance.

Issues: Whether the ITAT erred in directing registration despite the CIT's concerns about the trust's activities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the CIT's role is limited to verifying the application and the trust's charitable objectives, not assessing the application of income at this stage.

Result: Tax appeal dismissed.

ORDER :

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

1. This tax appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax, 1961 (for short, ‘the IT Act’) was admitted for hearing on 15-3-2023 by formulating the following substantial question of law:

“Whether on facts & circumstances of the case, the order of the Ld. Tribunal is correct in law and on facts in directing the Ld. CIT to grant the registration u/s 12 AA of the IT Act irrespective of non-genuineness of the activities of the institution evidenced in the impugned order of the Commissioner of Income Tax dated 28-09-2015, thereby rendering the decision which is perverse?”

2. The Association of Physicians, Branch: Durg-Bhilai i.e. the respondent herein has filed an application for registration under Section 12AA(1)(b)(i) of the IT Act in appropriate form before the competent authority and the said application was rejected by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) by order dated 28-9-2015 holding that the case of the Association of Physicians is not covered by the provisions contained in Section 12AA(1)(b)(i) of the IT Act. Feeling dissatisfied with the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) dated 28-9-2015, the respondent herein preferred an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and the ITAT by its impugned order, allowed the appeal filed by the respondent Association holding that the issue raised in the appeal is covered by the decision of this Court in the matter of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chhattisgarh Urology Society TAXC No.159/2017, decided on 17-1-2018 and directed the CIT(E) to grant registration in favour of the respondent Association / assessee under Section 12AA of the Act against which this appeal has been preferred.

3. Mr. Amit Chaudhari, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, would submit that the learned ITAT has committed legal error in directing for registration holding that it is covered by the decision of this Court in Chhattisgarh Urology Society’s case (supra), therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.

4. Mr. Mool Chand Jain, learned counsel appearing for the respondent through video conferencing, would submit that the case of the respondent herein is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Chhattisgarh Urology Society’s case (supra) which was also taken up in review on review petition being filed by the Revenue and by order dated 11-3-2019, the coordinate Bench of this Court has dismissed the review petition, thereafter, SLP was filed by the Revenue being SLP (Civil) Diary No. 33995/2019 which was also dismissed by the Supreme Court on 18-10-2019, as such, the instant tax appeal deserves to be dismissed.

5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered their rival submissions made herein-above and also went through the material available on record minutely and thoroughly as well.

6. Section 12AA(1)(b)(i) of the IT Act states as under: -

“12AA. Procedure for registration.—(1) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, on receipt of an application for registration of a trust or institution made under clause (a) or clause (aa) or clause (ab) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, shall—

(a) xxx xxx xxx

(b) after satisfying himself about the objects of the trust or institution and the genuineness of its activities as required under sub-clause (i) of clause (a) and compliance of the requirements under sub-clause (ii) of the said clause, he—

(i) shall pass an order in writing registering the trust or institution;

(ii) xxx xxx xxx

and a copy of such order shall be sent to the applicant:”

7. A careful perusal of the aforesaid provision would show that the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner has to satisfy himself about the objects of the trust or institution and the genuineness of its activities as required under sub-clause (i) of clause (a) and compliance of the requirements under sub-clause (ii) of the said clause, and has to pass an order in writing registering the trust or institution and a copy of the o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top