IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANJAY KUMAR JAISWAL, J.
Satyaprakash, Son of Ramchandra Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.643 of 2002
Decided on : 07-08-2024
(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 374(2) – Indian Penal Code – Sections 498A, 304B, and 306 – Appeal against conviction for dowry death and cruelty – Conviction under Section 304B IPC set aside due to lack of evidence showing cruelty or harassment for dowry demand soon before death. (Paras 27, 26)
Facts of the case: The deceased, Sadhna Gupta, was found dead under suspicious circumstances within seven years of her marriage. The prosecution alleged that she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by her husband and in-laws, leading to her suicide. (Paras 2, 3)
Findings of Court: The court found insufficient evidence to establish that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment in connection with dowry demands soon before her death. (Paras 26, 27)
Issues: The main issues were whether the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment for dowry and whether the conviction under Section 304B IPC was justified. (Paras 26, 27)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of Section 304B IPC, particularly the requirement of cruelty or harassment soon before death in connection with dowry. (Paras 26, 27)
Result: Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside. (Para 27)
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 4.6.2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jashpurnagar in Sessions Trial No.123 of 2001, whereby the Appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:
| Conviction | Sentence |
| Appellant No.1 | |
| Under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code | Rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and fine of Rs.500, in default of payment thereof, additional rigorous imprisonment for 2 months |
| Under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code | Rigorous imprisonment for 10 years |
| Appellants No.2 and 3 | |
| Under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code | Rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and fine of Rs.500, in default of payment thereof, additional rigorous imprisonment for 2 months |
2. According to the prosecution, the alleged incident took place in Primary School Basen, Police Station Kansabel, District Jashpur in the intervening night of 13th and 14th March, 2001. Information of the incident was given by Thadiyus Lakda (PW1) in Police Station Kansabel on 14.3.2001 at 11:30 O’clock. On the basis of the said information, morgue (Ex.P1) was registered. After morgue inquiry, First Information Report (Ex.P12) was registered against the Appellants on 24.3.2001. According to the prosecution, at the time of incident, Sadhna Gupta (deceased) was working as a Shiksha Karmi Grade-3 in Primary School Basen. Her marriage was solemnised with Appellant Satyaprakash in April, 2000. She had been living at her matrimonial house from before 15 days of the incident and she used to go to her school from there. On 13.3.2001 she had gone to the school for teaching. Incharge Master of the school, namely, Lochan Prasad Sahu was absent on that date. According to the students of the school, Sadhna Gupta had returned from the school after teaching in the evening. Later, in the night at about 9 O’clock, her husband inquired from the cook of the school, namely, Kusum in Basen that where was his wife Sadhna Gupta. On coming to know from the cook that Sadhna Gupta had returned, he returned. On 14.3.2001 at about 9:30 a.m. when cook Kusum reached school he found that the staff room which always remained locked was open and when he entered the staff room he found that Sadhna Gupta was lying dead on a wooden chair.
3. During investigation of the crime in question, it was found that in the marriage of Sadhna Gupta, her husband/Appellant No.1 was given cash of Rs.41,000 for a motorcycle and he was also given other domestic articles. After the marriage, the Appellants started treating Sadhna Gupta with cruelty. They, after consuming liquor, ill-treating her at the matrimonial house. They had been demanding account of her salary and asking her for bringing amount of Rs.50,000. Due to the ill-treatment at her matrimonial house, she came back to her maternal house. The Appellants created a pressure at her maternal house and took her back to her matrimonial house on 4.3.2001, but, their cruel behaviour with her did not change. On 12.3.2001, the Appellants again quarreled with her and, therefore, on 13.3.2001, she, after performing her duties in the school, consumed poisonous substance and committed suicide. Spot maps (Ex.P6, P13 and P14) were prepared. Dead body of Sadhna Gupta was sent to Primary Health Centre, Kansabel vide Ex.P5 for post mortem examination. Post mortem Report is Ex.P9. Seizures were made. Statements of witnesses were recorded. Seized articles were sent to Forensic Science Laboratory. FSL Report is Ex.P15.
4. On completion of the investigation, a charge-sheet was filed against the Appellants. Charges were framed against them under Sections 498A, 304B and 306 IPC.
5. To bring home the offence against the Appellants, the prosecution examined as many as 15 witnesses. Statements of the Appellants were recorded under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Proc
The prosecution must prove that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment for dowry soon before her death to establish a case under Section 304B IPC.
To sustain a conviction under Section 304B IPC, the prosecution must establish a proximate link between dowry-related cruelty and the victim's death within seven years of marriage, demonstrating that....
The prosecution must establish all ingredients of Section 304B IPC, including demand for dowry soon before death, to invoke presumption of guilt under Section 113B of the Evidence Act.
Point of Law : For offence Under Section 304-B Indian Penal Code, punishment is imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend to imprisonment for life.
The prosecution must prove cruelty or harassment for dowry demand soon before death to sustain a conviction under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC; insufficient evidence leads to acquittal.
The central legal point established is the application of Section 304B of IPC and Section 113-B of the Evidence Act in cases of dowry death, emphasizing the need for proximity between cruelty/harassm....
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 304-B IPC, establishing that the deceased was subjected to cruelty for dowry demands, leading to her suicide, thus satisfying the legal requirements fo....
The court mandated that for a conviction under Section 304-B IPC, the prosecution must demonstrate a proximate link between cruelty and the death, which was found lacking in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.