ANANDA SEN, GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Pradeep Yadav @ Mangra, S/o Khukharu Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ananda Sen, J.
The instant criminal appeal is directed against the conviction of sole appellant under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 17.06.2015 passed by learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Godda in S. T. Case No.72 of 2006, whereby the sole accused has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten years for the offence punishable under Section 304B of IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that there are no materials to convict this appellant for the charge framed under section 304B of the Indian Penal Code. It is his contention that charge could not have been framed under section 304B of the Indian Penal Code as it is apparent from the First Information Report itself wherein the informant had stated that the marriage of the deceased along with the appellant had taken place eight years ago. He further argued that there is no evidence that there was any demand for dowry soon before her death. It is his contention that the charge was only framed under section 304B of the Indian Penal Code and not under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and when the basic ingredients of demand of dowry fails,
Satvir Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab and Anr. reported in (2001) 8 SCC 633
Kans Raj vs. State of Punjab reported in (2000) 5 SCC 207
Baljinder Kaur v. State of Punjab reported in (2015) 2 SCC 629
Devender Singh v. State of Uttarakhand reported in (2022) 13 SCC 82
The prosecution must establish all ingredients of Section 304B IPC, including demand for dowry soon before death, to invoke presumption of guilt under Section 113B of the Evidence Act.
To sustain a conviction under Section 304B IPC, the prosecution must establish a proximate link between dowry-related cruelty and the victim's death within seven years of marriage, demonstrating that....
The prosecution must prove that the victim was subjected to cruelty or harassment in connection with dowry demands soon before her death to establish a case under Section 304B of the IPC; failure to ....
Conviction upheld - Dowry death - there was persistent demand of dowry made by accused from the victim who was used to subjected to cruelty and harassment for such demand and ultimately she had ended....
The central legal point established is the application of Section 304B of IPC and Section 113-B of the Evidence Act in cases of dowry death, emphasizing the need for proximity between cruelty/harassm....
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 304-B IPC, establishing that the deceased was subjected to cruelty for dowry demands, leading to her suicide, thus satisfying the legal requirements fo....
The court ruled that to establish dowry death under Section 304B IPC, the prosecution must show cruelty for dowry was inflicted soon before the victim's death, with a clear link between the two.
Dowry death – Mere death of deceased being unnatural in matrimonial home within seven years of marriage will not be sufficient to convict accused under Section 304B and 498A of IPC.
The prosecution must prove cruelty or harassment for dowry demand soon before death to sustain a conviction under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC; insufficient evidence leads to acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.