Back
RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Shradha Singh W/o Shri Akash Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Home – Respondent
ORDER :
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J.
Heard.
1.The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-
10.2 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the cost of the petition may be given.”
2.The facts of the present case are that the petitioner was initially appointed to the post of ‘Subedar' on probation for a period of two years under the Police Department on 14.07.2000 according to the Madhya Pradesh Police Executive (Non-Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1997 (for short’ the Rules of 1997’). The petitioner had to apply for the post of Civil Judge (Entry Level) in the State of Chhattisgarh, therefore, she sought a No Objection Certificate from the Director General of Police on 24.09.2004 and on 23.09.2005 the same was granted to the petitioner. A decision was
Continuation of service beyond probation does not equate to confirmation without an explicit order from the appointing authority.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that under Rule 10(A) of the Gujarat Civil Services (Classification and Recruitment) General Rules, 1967, the petitioner's services should be treat....
A probationary government servant is not automatically confirmed upon the expiry of probation; confirmation requires an affirmative order from a competent authority.
The maximum period of probation does not confer a right to confirmation; unsatisfactory performance justifies termination without a disciplinary hearing.
The discharge of a probationer must comply with procedural requirements, and insufficient assessment of performance leads to implied confirmation, while discharge based on unsatisfactory work isn't p....
Automatic confirmation of employment after probation is negated unless explicitly granted, with proper evaluation of work conduct essential for confirmation.
Eligibility for promotion under the Rajasthan High Court Staff Service Rules is based on grade rather than specific post, but mere financial upgradation does not confer entitlement to promotion.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
