NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI
Sanjay Sharma S/o Shri Ramkumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Chhatram Yadav S/o Tangu Yadav – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI, J.
1. This First Appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (henceforth “CPC”) against the impugned judgment and decree dated 29.01.2008 passed by the 2nd Upper District Judge (F.T.C.) Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 36-A/2007, whereby the suit filed by the appellant for specific performance of contract, has been dismissed by the learned trial Court.
(Hereinafter parties shall be referred as per their status before the trial Court)
2. Facts of the case in brief are that, suit for specific performance of contract was filed by the plaintiff before the trial Court, pleading inter alia that, original defendant/Chhatram Yadav had entered into the contract to sell out his suit land bearing Khasra No. 26/1 area 1.00 acre and Khasra No. 16/1 area 0.26 acre with the plaintiff, after receiving the advance amount, he executed ‘Mahadanama-Bikripatra’ on 30.06.2003 in favour of the plaintiff. Subsequently, defendant also received some part of the consideration. But ultimately, he refused to execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff, therefore, plaintiff filed civil suit for specific performance
Acharya Swami Ganesh Dassji vs. Sita Ram Thapar
Ardeshir Mama vs. Flora Sassoon
Man Kaur vs. Hartar Singh Sangha
Prem Raj vs. DLF Housing Co. Construction (P) Ltd. 1968 SCC Online SC 151 : AIR 1968 SC 1355
In a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract, supported by evidence of ownership and financial capability.
A plaintiff in a specific performance suit must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform their contractual obligations throughout, as mandated by Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act....
The plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform a contract for specific performance; mere possession or improvements do not suffice.
Plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform contract for specific performance; mere assertion is insufficient.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the plaintiff to prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform the essential terms of the contract, as mandated by Sect....
A plaintiff seeking specific performance must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform their contractual obligations; failure to do so bars relief.
Plaintiff's failure to prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform contract negates entitlement to specific performance under Specific Relief Act.
In a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff must prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract, which was not established in this case.
Time is of the essence of a contract if the parties have agreed that it is or if the circumstances of the case show that it is.
To secure a decree for specific performance, plaintiffs must demonstrate continuous readiness and willingness, supported by credible evidence, amidst a contract that specifies actionable terms.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.