IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL
Sunil Kumar Soni, S/o. Nathmal – Appellant
Versus
Ravindra Jaiswal, S/o. Nandlal Jaiswal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL, J.
1. The present first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the defendant No.1 against the Digitally impugned judgment and decree dated 05.07.2014, passed by learned 3rd Additional Judge to the Court of First Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, in Civil Suit No. 33-A/2013, whereby the decree for specific performance of contract has been passed in favour of the plaintiffs.
2. For the sake of convenience, the status of the parties as shown in the civil suit is being referred to in the present appeal.
3. The plaintiffs, Ravindra Jaiswal and Triloki Prasad Bhargava, filed a civil suit for specific performance of the contract and for possession of the suit land bearing khasra No. 418/1, area 0.36 acres situated in the village Sakari, P.H. No. 26, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur. It is pleaded in the plaint that, in the year 2008, the Sakri-Turkadih bypass road was constructed and the plaintiffs came into contact with the defendant No.1, who was in need of money and wanted to sell his land, which was situated adjacent to the bypass road. The plaintiffs tentatively get the measurement of the land of the plainti






Pydi Ramana @ Ramulu v. Devarasetty Manmadha Rao
Vijay Kumar and others v. Om Prakash
Vimlesh Kumari Kulshrestha v. Sambhajirao and another
Mary Pushpam v. Telvi Curusumary and others
Gangamma and others v. Shivalingaiah
Pawan Kumar Dutt and another v. Shakuntala Devi and others
Surjeet Singh and another v. Manoharlal and others
Manjunath Anandappa @ Shivappa v. Tammanasa and others
To secure a decree for specific performance, plaintiffs must demonstrate continuous readiness and willingness, supported by credible evidence, amidst a contract that specifies actionable terms.
A plaintiff in a specific performance suit must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform their contractual obligations throughout, as mandated by Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act....
The appellate court emphasized that specific performance requires proof of the plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform the contract, which was not adequately addressed by the trial Court.
The court emphasized the necessity for continuous proof of a party's readiness and willingness to perform contract obligations and that unregistered agreements impacting possession must be duly stamp....
Plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform contract for specific performance; mere assertion is insufficient.
The plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform a contract for specific performance, which was not established in this case due to the failure to show evidence of intention a....
In a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract, supported by evidence of ownership and financial capability.
In a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff must prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract, which was not established in this case.
Plaintiffs must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform a contract for specific performance, supported by evidence of financial capacity.
Time is of the essence of a contract if the parties have agreed that it is or if the circumstances of the case show that it is.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.