Back
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Anumita Bose, W/o. Shri Sujit Bose – Appellant
Versus
Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Through Its Registrar – Respondent
ORDER :
(Narendra Kumar Vyas, J.)
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 03.09.2020 (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent No. 2/Registrar, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya by which candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Assistant Professor (Soil Science & Agriculture Chemistry) has been rejected.
2. Brief facts as reflected from record are that an advertisement has been issued by respondent No. 2 on 14.11.2019 for appointment on the post of Assistant Professors for various subjects for Agriculture Colleges of Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur. The petitioner applied for the said post by submitting her application through online. In the month of May, 2020, a list of ineligible candidates was published by the respondent wherein name of the petitioner was shown. The petitioner submitted her objection/representation before the respondent authorities against rejection of her candidature along with essential documents to show her eligibility. The objection/representation has been rejected by the respondents and published list of ineligible candidates in the month of July, 2020 wherein name of the petitioner was also in
The rejection of a candidate's application for Assistant Professor based on academic qualifications was lawful as it adhered to the established criteria and regulations.
Eligibility criteria for recruitment must adhere to regulations in force at the time of advertisement; subsequent amendments cannot be applied retroactively.
Point of law: A criterion which has the effect of denying a candidate his right to be considered for the post on the principle that he is having higher qualification than prescribed cannot be rationa....
The employer has the right to prescribe qualifications suitable for the post, and the court cannot go into the issue of correctness of qualifications prescribed.
Article 14 is an integral part of our system, each and every State action is to be tested on touchstone of equality.
The Selection Committee cannot alter the essential qualifications for a position once the selection process has commenced, and the Chancellor has the authority to terminate appointments that do not c....
Service Matter - The concerned decision taking Authority has power to appoint the candidate for the post of Adhyapak Sahayak by relaxing the condition of NET/SLAT or Ph.D. It also appears that the pr....
The UGC Regulation prevails over the advertisement, and the court emphasized the importance of expert opinions and deferred to the UGC's assessment of the appellant's eligibility.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
