IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Arun R. Pedneker, J.
Tukaram Vitthal Daud - Appellant
Versus
Hon ble Chancellor - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 4777 of 2019
Decided On : 07-02-2023
TERMINATION - EMPLOYMENT DISPUTE - Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, Sections 76, 102(6); Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 - The court examined the qualifications required for the post of Associate Professor as per the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, particularly Section 76, which outlines the selection process and qualifications. The court emphasized that the Selection Committee cannot alter the essential qualifications once the selection process has commenced. The Chancellor's authority to review and terminate appointments under Section 102(6) of the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, was upheld, as the petitioner did not meet the requisite qualifications, particularly in terms of teaching experience and guidance of Ph.D. students, which were mandatory at the time of his appointment.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the termination of his services as Associate Professor in Mass Communication and Journalism by the Chancellor of North Maharashtra University, which was based on claims that he lacked the requisite qualifications, including teaching experience and guidance of Ph.D. students.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner did not possess the necessary qualifications as outlined in the advertisement for the position, specifically regarding the required teaching experience and the guidance of Ph.D. students. The court upheld the Chancellor's decision to terminate the petitioner's appointment, stating that the Selection Committee could not relax the essential qualifications.
Issues: Whether the petitioner possessed the requisite qualifications for the post of Associate Professor as per the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, and whether the Chancellor had the authority to terminate the petitioner's appointment based on the findings of a fact-finding committee.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the qualifications for the post of Associate Professor, as advertised, were mandatory and could not be altered by the Selection Committee. The Chancellor's authority to review and terminate appointments under the relevant provisions of the Maharashtra Universities Act was affirmed, as the petitioner failed to demonstrate that he met the essential qualifications.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the termination of the petitioner's services as Associate Professor.
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. By the present petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dtd. 16/3/2019 passed by the respondent no.1 - Hon'ble Chancellor directing the respondent no.3 - Vice Chancellor, Kaviyatri Bahinabai Chaudhari North Maharashtra University, Umavi nagar, Jalgaon to terminate the services of the petitioner on the post of Associate Professor in the subject of Mass Communication and Journalism and also consequential order dtd. 20/3/2019 issued by the respondent no. 3 - Vice Chancellor, thereby terminating the services of the petitioner to the post of Associate Professor with effect from 20/4/2019.
2. Brief facts leading to filing of the petition can be summarized are as under :
<WXY>i] The respondent no. 2 - University published advertisement on 4/10/2012 in the daily news papers, namely, Indian Express, Dainik Samrat, Dainik Punya Nagari, Dainik Divya Marathi etc. and also on the website of the University, thereby calling upon the applications for various posts including the post of Associate Professor from Open Category in the Department of Mass Communication and Journalism. In the said advertisement, the following qualification was prescribed for the post of Associate Professor in the Department of Mass Communication and Journalism :
i. Good academic record with Ph.D. degree in the concerned / allied / relevant disciplines.
ii. A Masters Degree with at least 55% marks (or an equivalent grade in a point scale wherever grading system is followed).
iii. A minimum of 8 years of experience of teaching and or research in an academic research position equivalent to that of Assistant Professor in a university, college or accredited research institution / industry excluding the period of Ph.D. research with evidence of published work and a minimum of 5 publications as books and/or research/policy paper.
iv. Contribution to educational innovation, design of new curricular and courses, and technology mediated teaching learning process with evidence of having guided Doctoral candidates and research students. v. A minimum score as stipulated in the Academic Performance Indicator (API) based Performance Based Appraisal System (PBAS), set out in the UGC Regulations, appendix III dtd. 30/6/2010.
ii] Pursuant to the said advertisement, the respondent no.2 received the applications for the post of Associate Professor in the Department of Mass Communication and Journalism, NMU, Jalgaon of three candidates viz. Dr. Tukaram Vitthal Daud [petitioner], Dr.Vishaka Murlidhar Garkhedkar and Dr.Sudhir Bhagwan Bhatkar [respondent no.4]. On scrutiny of the applications, Dr.Vishaka Murlidhar Garkhedkar and Dr.Sudhir Bhagwan Bhatkar were not found ineligible and the petitioner was the only candidates found eligible. The case of the petitioner was considered by the duly constituted Selection Committee under Sec. 76 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 [for short 'the 1994 Act']. The said Selection Committee recommended the name of the petitioner, and accordingly, the petitioner was appointed on 17/12/2012 on probation period of 2 years in the Department of Mass Communication and Journalism. The said appointment was, thereafter, confirmed on 14/7/2015. iii] Dr. Sudhir Bhagwan Bhatkar i.e. respondent no.4 challenged the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Associate Professor before the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad by filing a Writ Petition No.11467/2014. This Court, while hearing the above Writ Petition, passed the order dtd. 16/12/2014 observing that there is an alternate remedy provided under sub-sec. (7) of Sec. 76 of the 1994 Act and the said Writ Petition was disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner therein to file appropriate proceeding under Sec. 76 (7) of the 1994 Act before the Hon'ble Chancellor.
iv] The respondent no.4, thereafter, filed a representation under Sec. 76 [7] of the Act of 1994 before the Hon'ble Chancellor on 22/12/2014. The Hon'ble Chancellor, vide letter / order dtd. 13/1/2015, directed





Aligarh Muslim University vs. Mansoor Ali Khan
B.C.Mylarappa Alias Dr.Chikkamylarappa
D.Sarojakumari vs. R.Helen Thilakom
K. L. Tripathi vs. State Bank of India
Mohd. Sartaj and Anr. vs. State of U.P.
Mrs.Celina Almeida vs. Minister of Urban Development
Neelima Misra vs. Harinder Kaur Paintal
Pradeep Kumar Rai and Others vs. Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Prakash Ratan Sinha vs. State of Bihar
Rajendra Singh vs. State of M.P
S. K. Sharma vs. State Bank of Patiala
Shailaja D/O. Bhujangrao Wadikar vs. The Honble Chancellor
The Chancellor and Another vs. Dr.Bijayananda Kar
The Registrar, University of Mumbai and Anr. vs. Sandeep Kumar Khatri
The University of Mysore vs. C.D.Govinda Rao
The Selection Committee cannot alter the essential qualifications for a position once the selection process has commenced, and the Chancellor has the authority to terminate appointments that do not c....
Termination of educators requires adherence to procedural rules and natural justice; significant delays in actions against previously appointed individuals are not permissible without substantial mis....
Employment and Service matter - Appointment as an Associate Professor in the School of Social Sciences of the Mahatma Gandhi University - Selection committee – Qualiification - Absence of post doctor....
The main legal point established is the requirement of adherence to the principles of natural justice, including providing an opportunity of hearing, in termination proceedings, and the applicability....
Appointment – Parameters to be applied to a case where an incumbent to a post does not fulfil qualifications prescribed for a post, are different from parameters to be applied to a case where no spec....
It is in interest of University that all doubts regarding appointment of teachers are raised within a period of three months to have an early decision by Chancellor to give quietus to disputes in Uni....
The court upheld the Selection Committee's decision insisting that qualifications for academic posts must be evaluated by experts, and judicial interference is warranted only under extreme circumstan....
Termination without due process violates natural justice; confirmed employees must be given an opportunity to present their case per established service rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.