HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ., Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Sukwariya Bai W/o Devnarayan - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Chhattisgarh - Respondent
CRA No. 1573 of 2018
Decided On : 20-01-2025
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 326 - Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and causing grievous hurt - Appellant convicted for life imprisonment and fine for killing two individuals and injuring a third - Evidence from child witness deemed reliable, corroborated by medical reports and eyewitness accounts - Court affirms trial court's findings on the nature of death as homicidal. (Paras 1, 12, 18, 41)
(B) Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 118 - Competency of child witnesses - Court emphasizes that child testimony is not to be dismissed outright but evaluated for reliability and understanding - Testimony of child witness found credible and corroborated by other evidence. (Paras 22, 24, 28)
Facts of the case:
The appellant was accused of murdering her mother-in-law and father-in-law and injuring her daughter during an incident on 19/05/2014. The prosecution presented multiple eyewitnesses, including the injured daughter, who testified against the appellant. (Paras 2, 3, 36)
Findings of Court:
The trial court found the appellant guilty based on the evidence presented, including the testimony of the child witness and the recovery of the murder weapon, which had bloodstains. (Paras 12, 41)
Issues: The court addressed whether the trial court was justified in concluding the deaths were homicidal and whether the child witness's testimony could be relied upon for conviction. (Paras 17, 21)
Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld the trial court's findings, affirming that the evidence presented was sufficient to establish the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly emphasizing the reliability of the child witness's testimony. (Paras 18, 41)
Result: Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.
Judgment :
(Ramesh Sinha, CJ.)
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the CrPC is directed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27.07.2018 passed by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Manendragarh, District- Korea (C.G.) in Sessions Trial No.104/2014, by which the appellant herein has been convicted for offence under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo S.I. for 03 months and under Section 326 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 03 years and fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo S.I. for 03 months.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on the date of incident i.e. 19/05/2014, the complainant Devnarayan Gond (PW-2) had gone to the house of Gajrup Singh Gond of the village to work in a marriage function. His mother Kamla Bai, father Thakur Prasad, sons Lallu Prasad and Shiv Prasad, daughter Rajkumari and his wife Sukavariya (accused) were in the house. Then Lallu Prasad (PW-7) and Raghu (PW-5) came to Gajrup Singh Gond's house and informed the complainant that Kamla Bai, Thakur Prasad and Rajkumari had been seriously injured. When the complainant came to his house, he saw that his mother Kamla Bai was lying on a cot outside the house, moaning with serious injuries on her face and mouth and his father Thakur Prasad was lying on the ground, with injuries on his head, legs and face and his daughter Rajkumari had also injured in the mouth. Regarding the incident, Rajkumari told that Sukawariya (accused) was leaving the house with Mahua in a sack and when she refused, Sukawariya beat Kamala Bai, Thakur Prasad and Rajkumari with an iron crowbar and ran away from the house. The complainant informed his neighbours Santosh (PW-6) and Sukhmaniya (PW-10) about the above and took Kamala Bai and Thakur Prasad in Kallu's car of the same village to Khargawan Hospital for treatment, from where, on referral, he took them to District Hospital, Baikunthpur, where Kamala Bai and Thakur Prasad died during treatment at night. Injured Rajkumari was also treated at Baikunthpur Hospital.
3. On the information of the incident given by the complainant Devnarayan (PW-2) in the police station Baikunthpur, Sub- Inspector J.S. Kanwar (PW-16) filed an unnumbered Merg Intimiation No.-0/2014 (Ex.P-3) regarding the death of Thakur Prasad and Kamla Bai and against the accused, an unnumbered First Information Report No. 0/2014 was registered under sections 302, 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Ex.P-4). Thereafter on the same date i.e. 20/05/2014, the panchnama of the dead bodies of deceased Kamla Bai and deceased Thakur Prasad (Ex.P-5 and Ex.P-6 respectively) was prepared in the presence of witnesses, and for getting the post-mortem of their bodies done, duty certificate (Ex.P-19) was issued to constable Arju Ram Morche, and for post mortem the bodies were sent by writing a complaint (Ex.P-14 and P-15) to the Medical Officer of District Hospital, Baikunthpur. wherein, Dr. H.S. Shende (PW-13) conducted the postmortem over the dead body of the deceased Thakur Prasad and deceased Kamla Bai (Ex.P-14A and Ex.P-15A respectively) and while conducting the postmortem, he found uncountable injuries over the dead body of the deceased Thakur Prasad and deceased Kamla Bai.
4. Some of the injuries sustained by Thakur Prasad as per the postmortem report are as follows:-
“(i) On external examination of the dead body, it was found that Rigor Martis was present in the dead body, his mouth was swollen, his tongue was inside his teeth, eyes were closed, both pupils of the eyes were dilated.
(ii) On the front part of his right shoulder there was a stapes sulcus (stab wound) measuring 3 cm * 1/2 cm upto the depth of bone.
(iii) On the left side below the eye, there was a stapes sulcus measuring 3 cm * 1/2 cm upto the depth of bone which was present in the region below t
The court affirmed that child witness testimony can be reliable and sufficient for conviction if evaluated carefully, alongside corroborating evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appellants had a common intention to murder the victim, and their actions did not fall within the exception for culpable homicide not amou....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of scrutinizing the evidence provided by interested witnesses, establishing motive, and the need for corroborative evidence in criminal cases.
The testimony of relatives as witnesses requires careful scrutiny but can support conviction when credible, establishing culpable homicide in absence of intent to kill.
The intention or knowledge of the actor is a crucial factor in determining whether an act falls within the ambit of Section 300 IPC (murder) or Section 304 Part 1 IPC (culpable homicide not amounting....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.