IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Shri Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Arjun Singh Rajput, S/o Baijnath Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer of Police Station - Ajak, Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Judgment :
(Ramesh Sinha, CJ.)
1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11.12.2020 passed by the Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.) in Sessions Trial No.42 of 2018, whereby learned Special Judge has convicted and sentenced the appellant as follows:-
| Conviction | Sentence | |
| Under Section 449 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 | : | Rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, additional rigorous imprisonment for 1 month |
| Under Section 436 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 | : | Rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, additional rigorous imprisonment for 1 month |
| Under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 | : | Life imprisonment and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, additional rigorous imprisonment for 1 month |
| Under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (2 times) | : | Rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, additional rigorous imprisonment for 1 month |
| Under Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste & Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 | : | Life imprisonment and fine of Rs.500/-, in defa |
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
Devinder alias Kala Ram and others v. State of Haryana
Purshottam Chopra and another v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi)
A dying declaration can only serve as a basis for conviction if it is proven to be reliable and made in a fit mental state; otherwise, it cannot sustain a conviction.
Dying declarations can serve as the sole basis for conviction if deemed credible and made in a fit state of mind, as established in this case.
The court affirmed that a dying declaration can serve as the sole basis for conviction if it is credible, voluntary, and made in a fit state of mind.
A dying declaration must be trustworthy and corroborated; significant discrepancies in the statement led to acquittal due to reasonable doubt not established by prosecution.
A dying declaration must be supported by evidence of the declarant's mental fitness; absence of such certification undermines its reliability as a basis for conviction.
The court upheld the convictions based on the reliability of the dying declaration and corroborative evidence, affirming the principles governing the admissibility of such declarations.
A dying declaration must be certified by a medical professional regarding the declarant's mental fitness; failure to do so undermines its reliability as evidence in a murder conviction.
The admissibility and reliability of dying declarations as a sole basis for conviction, as established by various Supreme Court cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.