SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Chh) 434

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, C.J., BIBHU DATTA GURU, J.
Sitaram Ravi, S/o. Jeetan Ravi - Appellant
Versus 
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station, Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) – Respondent
CRA No. 499 of 2025
Decided On : 07-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ashok Kumar Swarnkar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Shashank Thakur, Dy. A.G.

A dying declaration must be trustworthy and corroborated; significant discrepancies in the statement led to acquittal due to reasonable doubt not established by prosecution.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 498A - Conviction for dowry-related homicide and cruelty - The appellant was sentenced to life and two years' rigorous imprisonment respectively for murdering his wife by burning her with kerosene following repeated dowry disputes. The court underscored that the dying declaration lacked corroborative evidence and was recorded under questionable circumstances, compromising its reliability. (Paras 1, 47, 56)

(B) Dying Declaration - Admissibility and Weight - The court noted discrepancies in the dying declaration regarding the time and circumstances of its recording and criticized the absence of medical certification confirming the deceased's fitness to make the declaration. This led to the conclusion that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 34-44)

Facts of the case:
The appellant assaulted his wife over dowry, eventually setting her on fire, leading to her death after two months due to septicemia. The trial court convicted him based primarily on the dying declaration. However, significant contradictions arose among witness accounts, undermining the prosecution's story. (Paras 1, 5, 12, 46)

Findings of Court:
The court held that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the charges due to reliance on a flawed dying declaration lacking corroboration, resulting in acquittal. (Paras 47, 49)

Issues: Whether the charges of dowry-related homicide and cruelty were proven beyond a reasonable doubt, specifically considering the credibility of the dying declaration. (Paras 17, 46)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that a dying declaration must be credible and sufficiently corroborated. It determined that the flaws in the dying declaration and witness testimonies necessitated acquittal. (Paras 52, 54)

Result: Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside, leading to the appellant's acquittal and release. (Paras 47, 49)

Table of Content
1. facts surrounding sunita's injuries and death. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. appellant's arguments against evidence and conviction. (Para 10 , 11 , 14 , 15)
3. court's observation on evidence and prosecution's case. (Para 12 , 13 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. legal principles governing dying declarations. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
5. final judgment acquitting the appellant. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 52 , 56)

JUDGMENT :

Ramesh Sinha, C.J.

1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27.11.2024 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) in Sessions Trial No.89/2019, whereby learned Additional Sessions Judge has convicted the appellant for offence under Sections 498A of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo RI for 02 years and fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for one month and under Sections 302 of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo RI for life and fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for three months.

2. The prosecution story in brief is that a report was lodged by Smt. Savita (PW-3) at the police post Manipur, Police Station Ambikapur that her daughter Sunita was married to Sitaram in the year 2007. Since the marriage, Sitaram used to quarrel and beat his wife Sunita saying that he would not give anything in dowry. On 02.05.2019, his son-in-law Sitaram returned home after attending a marriage ceremony in village Jabar and beat his wife Sunita over dowry issue and poured kerosene on her and set her on fire with the intention of killing her. When Sunita somehow ran out of the house to extinguish the fire, her elder brother-in-law Krishna Ravi and his wife Shanti, who live in the neighborhood, heard the noise and admitted her to Balrampur Hospital for treatment, where Sunita's condition did not improve and she was admitted to the District Hospital Ambikapur.

3. On the report of Smt. Savita (PW-3) at Manipur Police Outpost, Head Constable Anil Singh (PW-7) at Ambikapur Police Station, crime under Sections 498K and 307 of the Indian Penal Code was registered on zero by the police, the FIR registered on zero is Ex.P-34. When the diary of the crime without number was brought to the Balrampur police station for registering the crime on number, Sub-Inspector of Balrampur Police Station Sampat Potai (PW 21) registered the First Information Report (Ex.P-37) for the crime under Sections 498K and 307 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 112/2019.

4. Inspector Umesh Baghel (PW-14) prepared the map of the incident site (Ex.P-26) and gave written complaint (Ex.P-18) to Tehsildar Balrampur regarding preparation of Patwari map of the incident site. Assistant Sub-Inspector Nirmala Kashyap (PW-17) sent written complaint (Ex.P-33) to Executive Magistrate Ambikapur regarding appointment of Magistrate to record the dying statement of Sunita Ravi. Deputy Tehsildar Kishore Kumar Verma (PW-20) recorded Sunita's dying statement (Ex.P-36). Dr. V.C. Paikara (PW-16) advised to admit Sunita in Burn Ward due to her burns, OPD slip Exhibit is P-32.

5. After Sunita's treatment in Ambikapur, she was discharged on 28/05/2019 and her treatment continued at home and she died on 10/07/2019. On receiving the information of Sunita's death, an unnumbered FIR (Ex.P-29) was registered at Chalgali Police Station. On receipt of FIR No. 08/19 for numbering from Chalgali Police Station by Sub-Inspector Shantilal Kujur (PW-13), he registered FIR No. 34/2019 at Balrampur Police Station, which is Ex.P-15.

6. After Inspector Pradyuman Tiwari (PW-15) gave the written complaint (Ex.P-30) to the Executive Magistrate for the proceedings of the body panchanama, the Tehsildar Shabad Khan (PW-19) issued a notice (Ex.P-4) to the witnesses for the map panchayatnama and the map panchayatnama of the deceased (Ex.P-7) was prepared in front of the witnesses.

7. After the post-mortem examination of the dead

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top